657582 - Create l10n-mozilla-5.0.ini

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)

Description

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Attachment: cp l10n-mozilla-2.0.ini to l10n-mozilla-5.0.ini and fix paths

For the split 5.0 repos for mobile, we'll need an l10n.ini.

Probably best to do this after the actual beta split, with the attached patch.

Is there a bug on the mobile beta branch process that this should block?

Comment 1

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Attachment: wrong central repo name, fix that.

Comment 2

[Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) (use needinfo?)]

Comment on attachment 532928 [details] [diff] [review]
wrong central repo name, fix that.

I didn't see a tracking bug for Fennec 5 beta 2

Comment 3

[Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) (use needinfo?)]

found the tracking bug (bug 657534)

Comment 4

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Is there a reason this isn't going into mozilla-beta ?
We're going to be pushing from mozilla-beta regularly, and ignoring any changes in mozilla-mobile-5.0, so that would seem to be the correct solution.

Comment 5

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

I was hoping to not have to spoil -beta with this, but Aki's rationale seems to win in my eyes.

LegNeato, would you OK this to land on beta, to be killed as part of the next aurora-beta lift in 7 weeks?

Comment 6

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

I think monitoring mozilla-beta would be ok, and wouldn't need to be overwritten later.

I can't absolutely guarantee nothing will be checked directly into mozilla-mobile-5.0 and mobile-5.0, but for the most part we're going to be pushing from mozilla-beta -> those 2 repos, so if strings are signed off against mozilla-beta, they're signed off correctly.

That will require a new patch, but won't need to be reverted later.

Comment 7

[LegNeato]

Yeah, I think it makes sense to land on mozilla-beta as well...less risk of blowing it away accidentally.

Comment 8

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Aki, are you saying that the l10n dashboard shouldn't bother following mobile-5.0 at all, and just pretend that we'd be using mozilla-beta as repo?

That'd work for me, just clarifying. And we'd need the mobile folks to buy in.

Comment 9

[Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) (use needinfo?)]

(In reply to comment #8)

> That'd work for me, just clarifying. And we'd need the mobile folks to buy
> in.

Mobile folks buy in. mozilla-beta is our one-true repo :)

Comment 10

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

OK, I'll change my plans for today accordingly then.

Marking this INVALID.