Closed Bug 657582 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Create l10n-mozilla-5.0.ini

Categories

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)

Firefox 5
defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: Pike, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

For the split 5.0 repos for mobile, we'll need an l10n.ini.

Probably best to do this after the actual beta split, with the attached patch.

Is there a bug on the mobile beta branch process that this should block?
Attachment #532925 - Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #532925 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #532925 - Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #532928 - Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment on attachment 532928 [details] [diff] [review]
wrong central repo name, fix that.

I didn't see a tracking bug for Fennec 5 beta 2
Attachment #532928 - Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
found the tracking bug (bug 657534)
Blocks: 657534
Is there a reason this isn't going into mozilla-beta ?
We're going to be pushing from mozilla-beta regularly, and ignoring any changes in mozilla-mobile-5.0, so that would seem to be the correct solution.
I was hoping to not have to spoil -beta with this, but Aki's rationale seems to win in my eyes.

LegNeato, would you OK this to land on beta, to be killed as part of the next aurora-beta lift in 7 weeks?
I think monitoring mozilla-beta would be ok, and wouldn't need to be overwritten later.

I can't absolutely guarantee nothing will be checked directly into mozilla-mobile-5.0 and mobile-5.0, but for the most part we're going to be pushing from mozilla-beta -> those 2 repos, so if strings are signed off against mozilla-beta, they're signed off correctly.

That will require a new patch, but won't need to be reverted later.
Yeah, I think it makes sense to land on mozilla-beta as well...less risk of blowing it away accidentally.
Aki, are you saying that the l10n dashboard shouldn't bother following mobile-5.0 at all, and just pretend that we'd be using mozilla-beta as repo?

That'd work for me, just clarifying. And we'd need the mobile folks to buy in.
(In reply to comment #8)

> That'd work for me, just clarifying. And we'd need the mobile folks to buy
> in.

Mobile folks buy in. mozilla-beta is our one-true repo :)
OK, I'll change my plans for today accordingly then.

Marking this INVALID.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.