Closed
Bug 663466
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
crash @ __RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: marcia, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, topcrash-win, Whiteboard: [startupcrash])
Crash Data
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-40656464-c36a-409f-a8eb-193ac2110608 .
=============================================================
Seen while reviewing crash stats. https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=__RtlUserThreadStart to the crashes which span all versions.
Some of the comments mention having trouble with toolbars and a fair number have the addon compatibility extension installed. Addon correlation:
78% (39/50) vs. 1% (364/27164) compatibility@addons.mozilla.org
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (26/27164) {4D1E692F-D179-413b-A987-EEEAAD85DDB3}
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (26/27164) pbupload@photobucket.com (Photobucket Uploader, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/10035)
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (27/27164) plugin2@gameplaylabs.com
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (28/27164) gamesbar@oberon-media.com
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (28/27164) {f92a9fe4-2850-4198-b9d5-279880e49b16}
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (32/27164) searchtoolbar@zugo.com
52% (26/50) vs. 0% (42/27164) {8A9386B4-E958-4c4c-ADF4-8F26DB3E4829} (PriceGong, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/10433)
52% (26/50) vs. 1% (152/27164) {1E73965B-8B48-48be-9C8D-68B920ABC1C4}
52% (26/50) vs. 1% (302/27164) {635abd67-4fe9-1b23-4f01-e679fa7484c1} (Yahoo! Toolbar, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/2032)
52% (26/50) vs. 1% (389/27164) avg@igeared
52% (26/50) vs. 2% (524/27164) {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0026-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
52% (26/50) vs. 2% (641/27164) engine@conduit.com
36% (18/50) vs. 0% (21/27164) {32a1fd71-835e-4b11-8e54-886fda0b4c89}
36% (18/50) vs. 3% (907/27164) personas@christopher.beard (Personas, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/10900)
52% (26/50) vs. 22% (6000/27164) {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0024-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (14/27164) langpack-ru@firefox.mozilla.org
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (15/27164) sharing@addons.mozilla.org (Add-on Collector, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/11950)
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (20/27164) MafiaaFire@mafiaafire.com
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (32/27164) {cd617375-6743-4ee8-bac4-fbf10f35729e} (RightToClick, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/12572)
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (35/27164) ru@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org (Russian spellchecking dictionary, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/3703)
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (41/27164) fastdial@telega.phpnet.us (Fast Dial, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/5721)
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (46/27164) helper@savefrom.net
26% (13/50) vs. 0% (63/27164) SkipScreen@SkipScreen (SkipScreen, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/11243)
26% (13/50) vs. 2% (466/27164) {19503e42-ca3c-4c27-b1e2-9cdb2170ee34} (FlashGot, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/220)
26% (13/50) vs. 3% (887/27164) {D4DD63FA-01E4-46a7-B6B1-EDAB7D6AD389} (Download Statusbar, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/26)
32% (16/50) vs. 10% (2777/27164) {d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d} (Adblock Plus, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/1865)
26% (13/50) vs. 6% (1623/27164) {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0025-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
12% (6/50) vs. 0% (32/27164) {37964A3C-4EE8-47b1-8321-34DE2C39BA4D}
92% (46/50) vs. 82% (22208/27164) testpilot@labs.mozilla.com (Mozilla Labs - Test Pilot, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/13661)
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (5/27164) {d21e1d10-117c-11df-8a39-0800200c9a66}
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (8/27164) {6236BA26-C117-4007-928C-DE0716C7FA78} (Chameleon Bob: layouts for Facebook, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/11584)
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (9/27164) {6236BA26-C117-4007-928C-DE0716C7FA68} (Express Tab, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/14584)
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (14/27164) {6236BA26-C117-4007-928C-DE0716C7FA48}
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (24/27164) {6236BA26-C117-4007-928C-DE0716C7FA38}
10% (5/50) vs. 0% (92/27164) {3e9a3920-1b27-11da-8cd6-0800200c9a66}
14% (7/50) vs. 8% (2174/27164) {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0023-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/40656464-c36a-409f-a8eb-193ac2110608
Frame Module Signature [Expand] Source
0 @0x3f90000
1 ntdll.dll __RtlUserThreadStart
2 ntdll.dll _RtlUserThreadStart
| Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ __RtlUserThreadStart]
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Appears at the #26 spot on 8.0 and #18 on 8.0.1 over the past week.
Keywords: topcrash
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
It's in the long list of bugs correlated to Спутник @Mail.Ru and Yandex.Bar:
68% (101/148) vs. 7% (3725/51702) yasearch@yandex.ru (Yandex.Bar, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/3495)
64% (94/148) vs. 6% (3010/51702) {37964A3C-4EE8-47b1-8321-34DE2C39BA4D}
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ __RtlUserThreadStart] → [@ __RtlUserThreadStart]
[@ __RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart]
Summary: crash [@ __RtlUserThreadStart] → crash @ __RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart
Updated•13 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ __RtlUserThreadStart]
[@ __RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart] → [@ __RtlUserThreadStart]
[@ __RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart ]
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
This seems to have gone way down in volume. Sitting at #63 on Fx12. Removing the top crash keyword.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
It's #27 browser crasher in 21.0, #14 in 22.0b3 and 23.0a2, and #40 in 24.0a1.
Windows XP is not affected. 93% of crashes are at startup.
Here are interesting correlations:
* 21.0:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC (270 crashes)
64% (173/270) vs. 12% (13495/111807) aswJsFlt.dll (Avast! Antivirus Script Blocking filter library)
3% (8/270) vs. 0% (398/111807) 6.0.1367.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (23/111807) 7.0.1451.402
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (188/111807) 7.0.1455.186
1% (3/270) vs. 0% (369/111807) 7.0.1456.418
2% (6/270) vs. 1% (846/111807) 7.0.1466.549
15% (40/270) vs. 2% (2717/111807) 7.0.1474.765
17% (46/270) vs. 3% (3571/111807) 8.0.1483.72
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (333/111807) 8.0.1488.286
22% (60/270) vs. 4% (4040/111807) 8.0.1489.300
66% (177/270) vs. 17% (18596/111807) snxhk.dll (Avast! Antivirus)
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (125/111807) 6.0.1125.0
3% (8/270) vs. 0% (415/111807) 6.0.1367.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (162/111807) 6.0.999.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (25/111807) 7.0.1451.402
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (209/111807) 7.0.1455.186
1% (3/270) vs. 0% (384/111807) 7.0.1456.418
2% (6/270) vs. 1% (887/111807) 7.0.1466.549
15% (40/270) vs. 3% (2851/111807) 7.0.1474.765
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (339/111807) 8.0.1482.45
17% (46/270) vs. 5% (5265/111807) 8.0.1483.72
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (484/111807) 8.0.1488.286
23% (62/270) vs. 6% (6378/111807) 8.0.1489.300
52% (141/270) vs. 8% (8536/111807) BrowserProtect.dll (PerformerSoft Protector)
1% (3/270) vs. 1% (752/111807) 2.6.1095.52
51% (138/270) vs. 6% (7065/111807) 2.6.1249.132
24% (66/270) vs. 2% (2608/111807) Iminent.WinCore.dll (Iminent)
1% (2/270) vs. 0% (178/111807) 3.47.0.0
4% (12/270) vs. 0% (89/111807) 5.18.52.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (44/111807) 5.26.21.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (64/111807) 5.29.41.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (74/111807) 5.35.51.0
1% (2/270) vs. 0% (22/111807) 5.48.42.0
1% (2/270) vs. 0% (47/111807) 5.51.31.0
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (96/111807) 5.52.31.0
2% (5/270) vs. 0% (325/111807) 6.14.22.0
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (234/111807) 6.17.41.0
12% (32/270) vs. 0% (225/111807) 6.21.22.0
1% (3/270) vs. 1% (708/111807) 6.4.56.0
18% (48/270) vs. 4% (4215/111807) mgAdaptersProxy.dll (SweetIM Messenger)
1% (3/270) vs. 0% (99/111807) 3.3.0.7
0% (1/270) vs. 0% (58/111807) 3.4.0.5
1% (2/270) vs. 0% (35/111807) 3.5.0.8
1% (4/270) vs. 0% (301/111807) 3.6.0.2
5% (13/270) vs. 0% (296/111807) 3.6.0.8
2% (6/270) vs. 1% (771/111807) 3.7.0.5
7% (19/270) vs. 2% (2304/111807) 3.7.0.7
* 22.0 Beta:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE (323 crashes)
33% (106/323) vs. 1% (515/37606) datamngr.dll (Bandoo's Data Manager)
33% (106/323) vs. 1% (478/37606) 1.0.0.1
14% (44/323) vs. 1% (326/37606) McSACorePS.dll (McAfee SiteAdvisor)
14% (44/323) vs. 1% (260/37606) 3.6.0.137
0% (0/323) vs. 0% (3/37606) 3.6.1.106
14% (44/323) vs. 1% (329/37606) saplugin.dll (McAfee SiteAdvisor)
14% (44/323) vs. 1% (267/37606) 3.6.0.187
14% (44/323) vs. 2% (759/37606) sahook.dll (McAfee SiteAdvisor)
14% (44/323) vs. 1% (489/37606) 3.6.0.187
0% (0/323) vs. 0% (155/37606) 3.6.1.193
* 23.0a2:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE (25 crashes)
44% (11/25) vs. 2% (37/2095) avsda.dll (Avira Free Antivirus)
44% (11/25) vs. 1% (28/2095) 13.6.2.666
24% (6/25) vs. 0% (6/2095) KainyX.dll
I don't experience a startup crash with Avast! Antivirus Basic Edition with or without the extension in 21.0.
More reports at:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=__RtlUserThreadStart+|+_RtlUserThreadStart
tracking-firefox22:
--- → ?
tracking-firefox23:
--- → ?
Keywords: topcrash
OS: Windows NT → Windows 7
Whiteboard: startupcrash → [startupcrash]
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
We have a strong suspicion that this is a 3rd party issue since this wasn't a top crash while FF22 was on Beta.
One thing we saw in the crash comments that really concerned us was:
"any ideas, each time i open it i see the open in safe mode prompt for a split second then it goes straight to crash report and restarting firefox or quiting firefox doesnt seem to do anything"
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
That needinfo was meant to ask whether Kairo could check how many unique users are affected on each channel.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Including MattN, since he worked on bug 294260, and may be able to shine some light onto what situations would warrant the crash comment from comment 6. Especially since we think this was tickled by a third party.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #6)
> One thing we saw in the crash comments that really concerned us was:
>
> "any ideas, each time i open it i see the open in safe mode prompt for a
> split second then it goes straight to crash report and restarting firefox or
> quiting firefox doesnt seem to do anything"
I suspect it's just the startup crash detection doing its job but we are still hitting the crash in safe mode while the dialog is open. This elimates plugins as the cause because they shouldn't be started that early.
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #7)
> That needinfo was meant to ask whether Kairo could check how many unique
> users are affected on each channel.
breakpad=> SELECT version,COUNT(*) as crashes,COUNT(DISTINCT client_crash_date - install_age * interval '1 second') as installations FROM reports WHERE product='Firefox' AND signature='__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart' AND date_processed BETWEEN '2013-05-29' AND '2013-06-05' GROUP BY version;
version | crashes | installations
-----------+---------+---------------
[...]
21.0 | 2796 | 2014
22.0 | 1184 | 262
23.0a2 | 79 | 21
24.0a1 | 21 | 7
[...]
Starting next week, we should get those numbers in Signature Summaries on Socorro as well.
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Gavin - any suggestion on who could look at this startup crash? I believe Matt's comment 9 suggests this is an issue that's likely completely on our side.
Assignee: nobody → gavin.sharp
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #11)
> I believe Matt's comment 9 suggests this is an issue that's likely completely on our
> side.
He said "not plugins", which doesn't necessarily imply "completely on our side" :)
I don't have any ideas here, I think bsmedberg is a better wild-guess owner than I am.
Assignee: gavin.sharp → benjamin
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
What's the current rank of this? It's unlikely that I'll be able to work on this for a couple weeks at least.
Most of these appear to be Flash-process crashes that are not labeled as such. See e.g. https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/53347fea-bcf4-4e10-b87f-aa1062130614
It would be helpful if somebody could classify these by process by searching the module list for firefox.exe or plugin-container.exe or FlashPlayerPlugin*.exe
Flags: needinfo?
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
A comment in French says that Firefox crashes (at startup) after a Skype update.
Most comments are in Portuguese.
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #13)
> What's the current rank of this?
It's #15 top browser crasher in 21.0, #17 in 22.0b5 and 23.0a2. It jumps six ranks in one week.
For the last day, it's even #10 top crasher in 21.0.
> Most of these appear to be Flash-process crashes that are not labeled as
> such. See e.g.
> https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/53347fea-bcf4-4e10-b87f-
> aa1062130614
This one is bug 852096 and doesn't have the same correlations as this one. Compare comment 5 and bug 852096.
> It would be helpful if somebody could classify these by process by searching
> the module list for firefox.exe or plugin-container.exe or
> FlashPlayerPlugin*.exe
Here they are for 21.0:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC (602 crashes)
100% (601/602) vs. 69% (69637/101515) firefox.exe
No plugin-container.exe or FlashPlayerPlugin_*.exe correlations.
Flags: needinfo?
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Scoobidiver from comment #14)
> A comment in French says that Firefox crashes (at startup) after a Skype
> update.
Skype 6.5 was released on June 5 (second spike) and 6.3 on May 13 (first spike in comment 5). See http://blogs.skype.com/category/garage-updates/
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
It's #4 top browser crasher in the first days of 22.0 and still correlated to Avast Antivirus.
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
connor, can you contact Avast and see if they have any clues on this one? There's not much useful given the data we have other than the correlation. It looks like somebody is injecting code and trying to launch a thread but failing somehow.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mconnor)
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
#8 in Fx 23.0 Release
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
Current correlations:
Addons:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC (425 crashes)
66% (280/425) vs. 1% (1257/95359) {1B33E42F-EF14-4cd3-B6DC-174571C4349C}
43% (181/425) vs. 1% (1298/95359) cehomepage@mozillaonline.com
42% (179/425) vs. 1% (1320/95359) cpmanager@mozillaonline.com
41% (175/425) vs. 1% (1185/95359) cemigration@mozillaonline.com
39% (165/425) vs. 1% (1264/95359) tabimprovelite@mozillaonline.com
39% (164/425) vs. 1% (1228/95359) quicklaunch@mozillaonline.com
37% (157/425) vs. 1% (1044/95359) coba@mozilla.com.cn
36% (155/425) vs. 1% (1103/95359) semodifier@mozillaonline.com
35% (150/425) vs. 1% (912/95359) commonfix@mozillaonline.com
33% (142/425) vs. 1% (843/95359) account@mozillaonline.com
33% (140/425) vs. 1% (855/95359) easyscreenshot@mozillaonline.com
31% (132/425) vs. 1% (1024/95359) share_all_cn@mozillaonline.com
14% (60/425) vs. 0% (321/95359) xthunder@lshai.com
12% (49/425) vs. 1% (567/95359) livemargins@mozillaonline.com
9% (38/425) vs. 0% (185/95359) {3ec6f6a6-94e7-41d5-8c36-cec334456e1e}
7% (30/425) vs. 0% (242/95359) fontsetter@mozillaonline.com
7% (30/425) vs. 1% (947/95359) personas@christopher.beard (Personas, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/10900)
6% (26/425) vs. 0% (218/95359) zoompanel@mozillaonline.com
6% (25/425) vs. 0% (334/95359) netvideohunter@netvideohunter.com (NetVideoHunter Video Downloader, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/7447)
Modules:
__RtlUserThreadStart | _RtlUserThreadStart|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC (425 crashes)
99% (419/425) vs. 42% (39881/95359) DWrite.dll
96% (410/425) vs. 40% (38120/95359) cryptsp.dll
87% (370/425) vs. 39% (37657/95359) nlaapi.dll
87% (370/425) vs. 40% (37672/95359) NapiNSP.dll
99% (422/425) vs. 52% (49808/95359) ntmarta.dll
82% (348/425) vs. 35% (33544/95359) explorerframe.dll
72% (305/425) vs. 25% (23918/95359) d2d1.dll
82% (348/425) vs. 35% (33568/95359) dui70.dll
86% (366/425) vs. 39% (37618/95359) pnrpnsp.dll
73% (311/425) vs. 27% (25303/95359) dxgi.dll
83% (354/425) vs. 37% (35254/95359) FWPUCLNT.DLL
82% (348/425) vs. 36% (34383/95359) duser.dll
66% (280/425) vs. 25% (23899/95359) d3d10_1core.dll
66% (280/425) vs. 25% (23899/95359) d3d10_1.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 58% (55059/95359) samcli.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 58% (55082/95359) wkscli.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 58% (55085/95359) netutils.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 58% (55112/95359) srvcli.dll
100% (425/425) vs. 62% (58722/95359) propsys.dll
96% (410/425) vs. 59% (56296/95359) profapi.dll
38% (163/425) vs. 1% (1085/95359) oledlg.dll
58% (246/425) vs. 21% (19746/95359) winhttp.dll
38% (162/425) vs. 1% (930/95359) MinHook.32.dll
91% (385/425) vs. 54% (51065/95359) sspicli.dll
37% (159/425) vs. 1% (579/95359) msimtf.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 61% (58234/95359) devobj.dll
37% (159/425) vs. 1% (892/95359) npcoba32.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 61% (58352/95359) KERNELBASE.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 61% (58353/95359) sechost.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 61% (58353/95359) CRYPTBASE.dll
53% (224/425) vs. 17% (15762/95359) oleacc.dll
39% (166/425) vs. 3% (3194/95359) mshtml.dll
98% (415/425) vs. 62% (59085/95359) cfgmgr32.dll
100% (425/425) vs. 65% (61825/95359) winnsi.dll
100% (425/425) vs. 65% (61843/95359) IPHLPAPI.DLL
Looking at the add-ons, this looks very heavily correlated with the Mozilla China (mozillaonline.com) add-ons. It may be caused by something they ship there or by some other Chinese thing. We need input from them. Release Management, do you know who to ask there?
Flags: needinfo?(release-mgmt)
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
Let's ask Jorge first since he's more familiar with addons community
Flags: needinfo?(release-mgmt) → needinfo?(jorge)
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
{1B33E42F-EF14-4cd3-B6DC-174571C4349C} and xthunder@lshai.com are also Chinese add-ons, but not developed by Mozilla Online, so it's possible that this crash has more to do with the Chinese build of Firefox than the actual add-ons.
Hong, can you please look into this?
Flags: needinfo?(jorge) → needinfo?(htang)
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
The crash here looks a little similar to bug 902790, and the symptoms might also match (ie, that Avast or something is preventing the plugin child process from starting)?
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
The "or something" is the big question.
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
this signature drifts in and out of topcrash status
topcrash is being replaced by more precise keywords per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927557#c3
Keywords: topcrash → topcrash-win
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: benjamin → nobody
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jorge Villalobos [:jorgev] from comment #22)
> {1B33E42F-EF14-4cd3-B6DC-174571C4349C} and xthunder@lshai.com are also
> Chinese add-ons, but not developed by Mozilla Online, so it's possible that
> this crash has more to do with the Chinese build of Firefox than the actual
> add-ons.
>
> Hong, can you please look into this?
Chinese extension, either developed by us at Mozilla Online or not, does not appear in recent correlations of this crash, so clear needinfo for Hong.
Flags: needinfo?(htang)
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #17)
> connor, can you contact Avast and see if they have any clues on this one?
> There's not much useful given the data we have other than the correlation.
> It looks like somebody is injecting code and trying to launch a thread but
> failing somehow.
This question is still outstanding.
still an active crash according to https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=__RtlUserThreadStart%20|%20_RtlUserThreadStart#tab-sigsummary
Updated•7 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mconnor)
Comment 28•4 years ago
|
||
Marking this as Resolved > Worksforme since there are no more crashes with this signature in the past 6 months.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•