Closed
Bug 66644
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
[RfE] Mozilla should have preference for switching off Flash support etc.
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, enhancement)
SeaMonkey
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: mark.slater, Assigned: mpt)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
Attachments
(5 files)
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT)
BuildID: 20010124
Mozilla should offer option to switch off flash, shockwave and other rich media
support.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Goto news.com
2. Open any article
3. Swear demonically as your precious bandwidth is wasted on downloading those
damn flash banners
After seeing flash being used ever more in more... "intrusive" ways *cough*
banner ads *cough*, i think the option to switch off flash support (and other
stuff, for that matter [beatnik, realplayer etc.]) would be really really cool.
probably easier said than done, too =)
Will add screenshot of preferences.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Confirming and over to Prefs.
Assignee: asa → matt
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → Preferences
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows NT → All
QA Contact: doronr → sairuh
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: Mozilla should have preference for switching off Flash support etc. → [RfE] Mozilla should have preference for switching off Flash support etc.
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
That would be realy nice.
I'd much prefer a plugin arbitrator. Something that allows you to disable
plugins entirely, or change what mime types they handle. Since it would be
similar to helper applications, it should either go in that, or as
Navigator\Plugins.
=>UIDF for comments.
Assignee: matt → hangas
Component: Preferences → User Interface: Design Feedback
Keywords: helpwanted
QA Contact: sairuh → mpt
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
In the helper apps prefs for each MIME type, in addition to `Mozilla' `Ask me',
`Save to Disk', `Foo application', and `Bar plugin', we could have `Ignore'.
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
I think, in addition to the global on/off switch for these plugins, you should
be able to do it on a domain name basis as well. When you enter a domain to be
blocked (or allowed), you specify which plugins out of the ones installed
should be allowed/disallowed.
For example, right now I would just disable flash for go.com and
news.com/cnet.com, because those are the only sites I visit where they are
doing annoying flash ads.
Thomas Winzig <no_spam@winzig.com> please don't change the scope or focus of a
bug report. We try to limit bugs to a single issue. I suspect what you want is
already possible, please search bugzilla for site prefs bugs.
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
I'm sorry, I was trying to suggest the original feature request be usurped by
my idea.
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
I think that when the window saying "You need a plugin to view Shockwave Flash,
press ok to download." that pops up when you don't have the plugin installed
should contain also "No, and never bother me with that again" besides the "OK
and "cancel" buttons
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Seems like this bug is moving towards a plugin manager of sorts (kind of like
the cookie manager).
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Would it be sufficient to be able to uninstall plug-ins you don't want, and be
able to temporarily disable all plug-ins (or disable all plug-ins for a given
site)? I can't think of many situations where I'd want to allow Flash but not
Java, for example.
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
Well, I think it should be treated like cookies and images - you can have sites
with allowed/disallowed cookies, with allowed and disallowed images, so you
should have also list for allowing/disallowing plugins form certain sites, or do
it like images - have option to disallow rich media (plugins) from different
domains.
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
if i'm testing fallback, i'd want to be able to individually disable plugins.
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
Chaning the qa contact on these bugs to me. MPT will be moving to the
owner of this component shortly. I would like to thank him for all his hard
work as he moves roles in mozilla.org...Yada, Yada, Yada...
QA Contact: mpt → zach
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
Can this be of any help??
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
BTW I'm working on an more powerfull version right now.
O Play Macromedia Flash files only once
O Use Macromedia Flash file settings
O Never play Macromedia Flash files
/H-J.
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 86244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Assignee | ||
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
Bah.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19118 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
So, now you have one bug less Matthew. That other bug is not assigned to you!
Also note that that other bug is about a Plugin manager and not about blocking
Flash!
Yeah yeah, I hear you. You would say:" But IF that Plugin manager is capable of
setting the Mime-Type to none then there will be NO Flash content rendered.
That's right, but IF you do not use Mozilla at all, it won't render anything!
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
Bug 19118 now covers
- being able to change what plugins what handle what mime types.
- adding something similar to the cookie manager that determines whether a page
is allowed to load a plugin.
It seems to me like the first makes the most sense as global settings that few
people ever tweak, and the second as per-site settings that most advanced users
will look at. Does it really make sense to combine them into one ui? Would
combining them force the mime type settings to be per-site?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•