Closed Bug 668513 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

W3C Test failures for NavigationTiming: type and redirects

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

All
Other
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: igor.bazarny, Assigned: igor.bazarny)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.24 Safari/535.1 Steps to reproduce: 1. visit http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/test_navigation_type_backforward.htm - In this test, the page in the iframe is navigated to through a script operation (document.location.href=). The correct navigation type should be TYPE_NAVIGATE. Right now it's detected as TYPE_RESERVED. 2. visit http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/test_timing_attributes_order.htm - It has the same failure as above when detecting the transition type. 3. visit http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/test_timing_client_redirect.htm - The page is navigated to using a client meta-refresh redirect, so it's navigation type should be TYPE_NAVIGATE instead of TYPE_RESERVED. 4. http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/test_timing_server_redirect.htm - This is a server redirect within the same origin so the redirection count should be 1. Right now it's returnning 0. Actual results: 1, 2, 3: navigation.type is TYPE_RESERVED 4: redirectCount is 0 Expected results: 1, 2, 3: navigation.type is TYPE_NAVIGATE 4: redirectCount is 1
Blocks: 554045
Depends on: 570341
Tests and 2 small changes in implementation: - Change in navigation type conversion - Added field to store redirect count Related W3C tests now pass
Attachment #543152 - Flags: review?(Olli.Pettay)
Assignee: nobody → igor.bazarny
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Attachment #543152 - Flags: review?(Olli.Pettay) → review+
Comment on attachment 543152 [details] [diff] [review] Tests and fixes for navigation type and redirect count Btw, do we have tests for location.replace handling? If I read the code correctly, that would end up using LOAD_STOP_CONTENT_AND_REPLACE. Does the spec say anything about replace?
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/df4ec91d0b0a I'll let Igor answer the question in the last comment.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
No, we don't have tests for location.replace and if load type is LOAD_STOP_CONTENT_AND_REPLACE we will get wrong navigation type, as spec says 'TYPE_NAVIGATE: Navigation started by ... initializing through a script operation other than the ones used by TYPE_RELOAD and TYPE_BACK_FORWARD' We need a test and follow-up bug for that. thanks.
(In reply to comment #4) > We need a test and follow-up bug for that. Could you please file the bug. It should be easy to fix that one :)
Depends on: 685782
No longer depends on: 685782
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: