Closed Bug 668758 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

@font-face rules can interfere with generic-font prefs

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jfkthame, Assigned: jfkthame)

References

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 2 obsolete files)

CSS generics such as 'serif' are mapped to (language-dependent) font family names on the platform via the font preferences such as font.default.serif.x-western. However, if a @font-face rule happens to use the same family name as was used in the font prefs, the downloaded font will be used instead of the original platform font. Is this expected behavior? It seems wrong to me; I'd expect the mapping of generics to platform fonts via the preferences to be unaffected by @font-face usage on the page.
This demonstrates the unexpected interaction on OS X, and should work similarly on Windows AFAICS.
Assuming the current behavior is not actually wanted, here's an attempt to fix it by passing a flag in gfxFontGroup::ForEachFontInternal to tell it whether it should be checking the user font set or not.
Assignee: nobody → jfkthame
Attachment #543419 - Flags: review?(jdaggett)
Attached patch reftestSplinter Review
Attachment #543420 - Flags: review?(jdaggett)
Updated to fix build failure on Linux.
Attachment #543419 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #543525 - Flags: review?(jdaggett)
Attachment #543419 - Flags: review?(jdaggett)
Comment on attachment 543525 [details] [diff] [review] patch, don't look up prefs font families in the user font set Looks good but we really need to clean up the generic family code at some point, it's somewhat silly that we're parsing "serif" at this level. dbaron and I talked about this briefly in the past, I think we should be passing in a font list in an array with generics as special tokens, since the style system has already resolved these. But that's going to take a lot of effort to untangle existing code across platforms.
Attachment #543525 - Flags: review?(jdaggett) → review+
Attachment #543420 - Flags: review?(jdaggett) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Depends on: 671385
Depends on: 672951
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: