671261 - Dehydra: remove support of local gcc in configure script

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

Description

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

Created attachment 545656 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1

Comment 1

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

Created attachment 545657 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1.1

Updates the help message.

Comment 2

[(dormant account)]

Comment on attachment 545657 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1.1

Thanks, but this needs to go further.

--gcc-build should probably become --gcc. --gcc-src= should be removed

Comment 3

[Mike Hommey [:glandium]]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 545657 [details] [diff] [review] [review]
> Patch v1.1
> 
> Thanks, but this needs to go further.
> 
> --gcc-build should probably become --gcc. --gcc-src= should be removed

Why not remove the --gcc* options altogether, and use CC/CXX and fallback to cc/c++ when the environment variables aren't set, like most anything else?

Comment 4

[Joshua Cranmer [:jcranmer]]

It also shouldn't be necessary to put the full path in CC/CXX...

Comment 5

[(dormant account)]

Agreed with above

Comment 6

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

Created attachment 545937 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v2

Now, a specific g++ can be specified with CXX env variable. Otherwise, g++ is going to be used, except on MacOS X where g++-4.2 will be used. I'm not using dehydra on a Mac so I prefer to not change that. Let me know if I should.

Comment 7

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 545937 [details] [diff] [review] [review]
> Patch v2
> 
> Now, a specific g++ can be specified with CXX env variable. Otherwise, g++
> is going to be used, except on MacOS X where g++-4.2 will be used. I'm not
> using dehydra on a Mac so I prefer to not change that. Let me know if I
> should.

Actually, I wonder, Apple's gcc supports plugins?

Comment 8

[(dormant account)]

Comment on attachment 545937 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v2

This looks ok

Comment 9

[(dormant account)]

(In reply to comment #7)

> 
> Actually, I wonder, Apple's gcc supports plugins?

mac support is dead.

Comment 10

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> 
> > 
> > Actually, I wonder, Apple's gcc supports plugins?
> 
> mac support is dead.

Then I could just remove these lines, right?

Comment 11

[(dormant account)]

(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Actually, I wonder, Apple's gcc supports plugins?
> > 
> > mac support is dead.
> 
> Then I could just remove these lines, right?

sure

Comment 12

[Mounir Lamouri (:mounir)]

Pushed:
https://hg.mozilla.org/rewriting-and-analysis/dehydra/rev/468f253e4ae7