Closed
Bug 680499
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Back/Done buttons in new start-up Add-On UI respond poorly to muscle memory on Windows
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: jaws, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: ux-consistency)
Attachments
(1 file)
74.83 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
If making a change to an addon, for example disabling an addon, the next screen describes what is going to happen. At the bottom right of the screen, there are two buttons: [Back] [Done]. The buttons are positioned closely together, and common Windows users are used to seeing buttons like that meaning [OK] [Cancel]. Because of this, my muscle memory had me hit the [Back] button when I wanted to hit the [Done] button.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Looks to me like this dialog should use a <wizard>, rather than rolling it's own wizard-like logic... that should also take care of making the button order platform-appropriate.
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
>Looks to me like this dialog should use a <wizard>
that's fine in terms of getting the button order right (and not making this mistake in future multi-step processes), but we would want to update the visual design of the wizard to follow:
-one large title (as opposed to the three titles we currently have in our wizard)
-white back
-recessed area at the bottom for buttons
we are also using this style with setting up a Sync account (and again I think it might just be custom instead of using <wizard>
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
> >Looks to me like this dialog should use a <wizard> > > that's fine in terms of getting the button order right (and not making this > mistake in future multi-step processes), but we would want to update the > visual design of the wizard to follow: > > -one large title (as opposed to the three titles we currently have in our > wizard) > -white back > -recessed area at the bottom for buttons Has a bug been filed on this? These improvements don't seem like blocking issues and could be worked on independently and in parallel. In the meantime we should just use <wizard>, as getting the looks right but the interaction wrong (bug 680873 is another data point) isn't a good tradeoff.
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Keywords: ux-consistency
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
while this is a bug (we can adjust the button order and set a default button), switching this code over to beign a wizard and also modifying the wizard appearance might be overkill since we were planning this flow to mainly a one time thing for users.
Updated•13 years ago
|
tracking-firefox8:
--- → ?
---------------------------------[ Triage Comment ]--------------------------------- Tracking this Firefox 8 as we should get a call from UX/Product if this is required for the feature to ship. CCing Asa and Boriss as they are both on point according to the feature page @ https://wiki.mozilla.org/Extension_Manager:Projects:Third_Party_Add-on_Warnings
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Happy to see us fix this in a later release for any of the late-ugrading users, but I don't think I'd pull the feature over this and we're basically done with the 8 cycle so I wouldn't chase a fix either.
[triage comment] No longer tracking due to comment 6.
tracking-firefox8:
+ → ---
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Agreed that this is not optimal, but it shipped, and is a one-time UI, so I don't think we should worry about it. If we use it again in the future, we should consider upgrading the <wizard> to look native on Windows, and use that.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•