Closed
Bug 698944
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
"Assertion failure: [infer failure] Missing type in object [0x1019004c0] (index): int,"
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 700501
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox7 | - | unaffected |
firefox8 | - | unaffected |
firefox9 | - | unaffected |
firefox10 | - | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: gkw, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase, Whiteboard: [sg:critical] js-triage-needed)
o = __proto__ arguments.__proto__ = null gc() function f() { Object.keys(o)[2] } f() Function("for each(w in[0]){w}")() asserts js debug shell on JM changeset f951e9151626 with -m, -a and -n at Assertion failure: [infer failure] Missing type in object [0x1019004c0] (index): int, Changing "0" to "true" in the last line results in: Assertion failure: [infer failure] Missing type in object [0x101900140] (index): bool, just like this testcase: try { r } catch (e) {} function f(o) { o.__proto__ = null } f(arguments) gc() function g() { props = Object.getOwnPropertyNames([]) props[1] } g() Function("for each(z in[true]){s}")() Locking s-s because these failures tend to be bad. Assuming sg:critical unless otherwise shown. This was found using a combination of jsfunfuzz and jandem's method fuzzer. Related to bug 685321 ?
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Since this is TI related I'm marking 8 and earlier unaffected, if that's not the case please say so.
status-firefox10:
--- → affected
status-firefox7:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox8:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox9:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox10:
--- → +
tracking-firefox7:
--- → -
tracking-firefox8:
--- → -
tracking-firefox9:
--- → +
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: TI: "Assertion failure: [infer failure] Missing type in object [0x1019004c0] (index): int," → "Assertion failure: [infer failure] Missing type in object [0x1019004c0] (index): int,"
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
This does not affect either Firefox 9 or 10; it is a bug that is currently only on the JaegerMonkey branch, which is being used for object shrinking rather than TI (Gary and Christian, you shouldn't put TI: in bugs filed against the JM branch).
Updated•13 years ago
|
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•10 years ago
|
Group: core-security
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•