Closed Bug 704999 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Add support for GitHub for the 'See Also' field

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 4.4

People

(Reporter: mgorny, Assigned: selsky)

References

(Depends on 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 4 obsolete files)

Please add support for adding github issues in the 'See Also' field. Those take URL in the form: https://github.com/<user>/<project>/issues/<n> where <user> & <project> would be \S+?, and <n> would be \d+.
Assignee: general → selsky
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Attachment #578698 - Flags: review?(timello)
Comment on attachment 578698 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for github issues, v1 Just a side comment: > + # While GitHub URLs can be either HTTP or HTTPS, > + # always go with the HTTPS scheme, as that's the default. That's not exactly true, I'd say. Github URLs are always https; http always redirects.
How's this?
Attachment #578698 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #578698 - Flags: review?(timello)
Attachment #578772 - Flags: review?(timello)
Depends on: bz-seealso
Comment on attachment 578772 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for github issues, v2 Review of attachment 578772 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: Bugzilla/BugUrl/GitHub.pm @@ +50,5 @@ > + $username = $1; > + $repository_name = $2; > + $issue_id = $3; > + } else { > + ThrowUserError('bug_url_invalid', { url => $value }); Same as GetSatisfaction, should_handle could look for the right pattern and then we let class_for throw the error.
Attachment #578772 - Flags: review?(timello) → review-
I was following the examples of Debian.pm, Google.pm, Launchpad.pm, and Sourceforge.pm Should those also have a more complete pattern in should_handle?
CC'ing timello so that he can reply to Matt's question in comment 5.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Component: Bugzilla-General → Creating/Changing Bugs
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 5.0
(In reply to Matt Selsky [:selsky] from comment #5) > I was following the examples of Debian.pm, Google.pm, Launchpad.pm, and > Sourceforge.pm > > Should those also have a more complete pattern in should_handle? You know what? If class_for already does that why we are repeating code in the subclasses? Also, I think the reason => 'show_bug' only applies to Bugzillas... and we can't say if the 'id' is whether valid or not, unless per the pattern... So I think we could: 1. Move the content of [% IF reason == 'show_bug' %] in the user-error template to an [% ELSE %] and then no need to pass 'reason' in the class_for. 2. Completely remove the reason 'id' and 'show_bug' because we are going to catch that in the pattern of the should_handle method. I think it's enough to say that the url must be a valid url from any of the listed bug trackers.
So, the _check_value method would only be in charge of returning the URI object with the shortest url form for the bug tracker...
+1 this would be fantastic for b2g and pdf.js, which span across github and bugzilla.
Updated should_handle as per comment 7. Should _check_value be renamed to _canonify_url, or similar, since that's the purpose as per comment 8?
Attachment #578772 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #588800 - Flags: review?(timello)
Don't use Bugzilla::{Util,Error} since those are only called in the parent class.
Attachment #588800 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #588800 - Flags: review?(timello)
Attachment #588805 - Flags: review?(timello)
(In reply to Matt Selsky [:selsky] from comment #10) > Created attachment 588800 [details] [diff] [review] > Add support for github issues, v3 > > Updated should_handle as per comment 7. Should _check_value be renamed to > _canonify_url, or similar, since that's the purpose as per comment 8? No, _check_[something] is the default name for every validator in Bugzilla even though it is not actually 'validating' anything.
Comment on attachment 588805 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for github issues, v4 >=== added file 'Bugzilla/BugUrl/GitHub.pm' + >+sub should_handle { >+ my ($class, $uri) = @_; >+ >+ # GitHub issue URLs have only one form: >+ # https://github.com/USER_OR_TEAM_OR_ORGANIZATION_NAME/REPOSITORY_NAME/issues/111 >+ return ($uri->authority =~ /^github.com$/i >+ and $uri->path =~ m|^/[^/]+/[^/]+/issues/\d+$|) ? 1 : 0; Ah! This is where that GetSatisfaction code came from :) >+} >+ >+sub _check_value { >+ my $class = shift; >+ >+ my $uri = $class->SUPER::_check_value(@_); >+ >+ # GitHub HTTP URLs simply redirect to HTTPS, so just use >+ # the HTTPS scheme. >+ if ($uri->scheme eq 'http') { >+ $uri->scheme('https'); >+ } I agree, this is doing the exactly the same as GetSatisfaction does. Lets create a common method and use it here. Maybe as you suggested _canonify_url and call it here. Otherwise, it looks good.
Attachment #588805 - Flags: review?(timello) → review-
Summary: Please add support for github issue trackers to the 'See also' field → Add support for GitHub for the 'See Also' field
Matt, are you still available to update the patch? We'd really like this on b.m.o.
Simplify the scheme forcing.
Attachment #588805 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #609614 - Flags: review?(timello)
Comment on attachment 609614 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for github issues, v5 The patch should be changed to add GitHub in the MoreBugUrl extension.
Attachment #609614 - Flags: review?(timello) → review-
I think GitHub is popular enough to be in the core code.
Comment on attachment 609614 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for github issues, v5 So, otherwise the patch looks good.
Attachment #609614 - Flags: review- → review+
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval? → approval+
Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/ modified Bugzilla/BugUrl.pm added Bugzilla/BugUrl/GitHub.pm modified template/en/default/global/user-error.html.tmpl Committed revision 8202.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Keywords: relnote
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Blocks: 752871
Added to relnotes for 4.4.
Keywords: relnote
See Also: → 1088399
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: