Closed
Bug 710943
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
track CYCLE_COLLECTOR telemetry statistics
Categories
(Mozilla Metrics :: Frontend Reports, defect)
Mozilla Metrics
Frontend Reports
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Unreviewed
People
(Reporter: mccr8, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [Telemetry])
CYCLE_COLLECTOR is the length of time the browser is paused while the cycle collector is running, in ms. This may be a major source of pauses, so it would be good to track what is happening to this over time using telemetry.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Saptashi,
I think we need pretty fine resolution on this in order to catch regressions. Can we track this one on a daily basis for nightly builds(using platform build id)?
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Yes we would. Also, can we not bucket? That loses a **lot** of the granularity!
Raw time series per user e.g. User1: [300,120,300,800], User2:[100,2404,20302,...]
is the form of the data we want.
Also, as with everything telemetry (and Taras knows this), ideally we want, for a given new feature (that hypothetically improves CYCLE_COLLECTOR) - before and after or on/off switches for users.
Cheers
Saptarshi
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
What are you mostly interested in?
average / median / percentiles? And what is the comparison base? Same architecture?
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Hum - not bucket is not an option, but currently the info we have has the same bucket configuration
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Saptarshi Guha from comment #2)
> Yes we would. Also, can we not bucket? That loses a **lot** of the
> granularity!
>
> Raw time series per user e.g. User1: [300,120,300,800],
> User2:[100,2404,20302,...]
>
> is the form of the data we want.
>
> Also, as with everything telemetry (and Taras knows this), ideally we want,
> for a given new feature (that hypothetically improves CYCLE_COLLECTOR) -
> before and after or on/off switches for users.
> Cheers
> Saptarshi
Not bucketing adds book-keeping overhead. If you like we can rebucket it or give you more buckets.
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
You need more buckets. Do we already have a histogram of CYCLE_COLLECTOR? Can we see it here? We could further subdivide the buckets in cases where there are too many.
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Saptarshi Guha from comment #6)
> You need more buckets. Do we already have a histogram of CYCLE_COLLECTOR?
> Can we see it here? We could further subdivide the buckets in cases where
> there are too many.
how many buckets do you want?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Group: metrics-private
Whiteboard: [Telemetry]
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrew McCreight [:mccr8] from comment #0)
> CYCLE_COLLECTOR is the length of time the browser is paused while the cycle
> collector is running, in ms. This may be a major source of pauses, so it
> would be good to track what is happening to this over time using telemetry.
Btw, i recently did these charts: http://people.mozilla.org/~sguha/cyccollector.uptime.html
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Closing 2011 ext still marked as NEW req.
Not in current scope of work.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•