Closed Bug 723839 (SM2.8b1) Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Tracking bug for build and release of SeaMonkey 2.8 Beta 1

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Release Engineering, defect, P1)

SeaMonkey 2.8 Branch
defect

Tracking

(seamonkey2.8+ verified)

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
seamonkey2.8 + verified

People

(Reporter: ewong, Assigned: ewong)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

This is a tracking bug for Build and Release of SeaMonkey 2.8 Beta 1

We expect an actual release on 4th February 2012.
Depends on: 723840
Attachment #594082 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Assignee: nobody → ewong
Comment on attachment 594082 [details] [diff] [review]
Update configs for SeaMonkey 2.8 beta1.

>-chatzillaRepoRevision      = '48d3ca3f72e4' # 0.9.88 but without the version change.
>+chatzillaRepoRevision      = 'CHATZILLA_0_9_88_RELEASE' # 0.9.88 but without the version change.

Nit: lets drop this comment -- doesn't have to be this checkin, but this cycle would be good.
Attachment #594082 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Fixed nit from Comment #2.
Attachment #594082 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #594084 - Flags: review+
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 724076
Hmm, having been on an older 2.7 beta (2.7b4 probably), I got an update for 2.7b5, but not 2.8b1 today (re-checked multiple times). Is the AUS update step just missing or something broken? FWIW, I'm currently on Linux (32 bit).

[If it's manageable from a releng POV, I vote for somehow including the AUS step in release tracking bugs (setup and/or verification).]
(In reply to Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley) from comment #4)
> Hmm, having been on an older 2.7 beta (2.7b4 probably), I got an update for
> 2.7b5, but not 2.8b1 today (re-checked multiple times). Is the AUS update
> step just missing or something broken? FWIW, I'm currently on Linux (32 bit).
> 
> [If it's manageable from a releng POV, I vote for somehow including the AUS
> step in release tracking bugs (setup and/or verification).]

It should be ok now.  I just checked my 2.6.1 beta and it's upgrading to 2.8b1.
So I'm closing this bug.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Blocks: SM2.8b2
Depends on: SM29-RELNOTE
No longer depends on: SM29-RELNOTE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: