Closed Bug 724072 Opened 10 years ago Closed 9 years ago
If using multiple processes, display pid along with NS
Debugging multiprocess Firefox is complicated by the fact that NS_WARNINGs are not tagged with a pid. We could unconditionally display the pid, but then that's added noise for the majority of people, who aren't developing for e10s. As a compromise, I propose displaying the pid only when we've spawned a subprocess. Does the plugin-container process output NS_WARNINGs?
They could, but since they don't use XPCOM I don't think they actually do.
What you propose sounds hard. jduell made us process-specific NSPR log files, which should satisfy your use case here.
> jduell made us process-specific NSPR log files, which should satisfy your use case here. NS_Warning doesn't appear to be written via PR_Log, so this doesn't help much, unless I misunderstand.
Attachment #594797 - Flags: feedback?(jones.chris.g)
(In reply to Justin Lebar [:jlebar] from comment #3) > > jduell made us process-specific NSPR log files, which should satisfy your use case here. > > NS_Warning doesn't appear to be written via PR_Log, so this doesn't help > much, unless I misunderstand. Nope, you don't. My understanding was wrong.
Comment on attachment 594797 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Looks good. Use GetCurrentProcId() from base/process_util.h for the tagging.
Attachment #594797 - Flags: feedback?(jones.chris.g) → feedback+
After working with this for a few days, I want to display "Parent" or "Child" along with the PID. But doing that requires calling ClearOnShutdown from this function I'd like to be thread-safe (so we don't leak the description string). Which requires making ClearOnShutdown thread-safe. Thus, bug 725519.
Why is that necessary, can't those be static strings?
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #8) > Why is that necessary, can't those be static strings? We could require that the char* passed for the string be statically-allocated. I can't enforce that with the type system, so I figured I wouldn't add a footgun opportunity to the API. But maybe it's worth the hack. We should probably make ClearOnShutdown thread-safe anyway.
Let's just make nsDebugImpl::SetMultiprocessMode main-thread only. That'll simply things.
Attachment #594797 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee: nobody → justin.lebar+bug
Remove unnecessary include.
Comment on attachment 613369 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2.1 So this will not have any effects for plugin parent/child relations, only content? That's ok, although it seems a bit surprising that simply creating a ContentParent will change the output of NS_WARNING in general.
Attachment #613369 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla14
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.