Closed
Bug 73035
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
JIS X 0213 support
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Core
Internationalization
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
Future
People
(Reporter: nhottanscp, Assigned: nhottanscp)
References
Details
(Keywords: intl, meta)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
69.53 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details |
This is a tracking bug so we can keep information about JIS 0213.
Currently, no IANA registry for charset and some chars
Following information was provided by watanabe@komadori.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp.
The JIS X0213 code table is in
http://www.jca.apc.org/%7Eearthian/aozora/0213/jisx0213code.zip
This table contains Japanese characters encoded by Shift_JIS. Some
X0213 characters are not members of the Unicode. The graphical shape
tables are in
http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/228.pdf
http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/229.pdf
These are ISO-2022 registry.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Mark as future.
In the table, there are 491 characters which are not mapped to unicode.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
MacOS X supports input JIS 0213 characters.
They have glyphs for some characters. I will attach a screen shot once I learn
how to take a screen shot.
On e-mail (Apple's default mail client), those characters are sent as UTF-8.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Updated•24 years ago
|
QA Contact: andreasb → ylong
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Correction. Change "blocks" to "depends on". Sorry for spam.
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Maybe the data pointers for this bug must be updated ?
It will be necessary to take care of Shift_JIS-2004/Shift_JISX0213 when doing that :
http://homepage1.nifty.com/nomenclator/perl/ShiftJIS-X0213-MapUTF.html
A first step would be to include support for characters from JIS 213 that are
inside the BMP, to remove the dependance on bug 162431.
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
What issues want to fix in this bug?
I think that we should not support JIS X 0213 on Japanese local encodings, i.e, on Shift_JIS, EUC-JP and ISO-2022-JP*. Because if we support JIS X 0213 on these encodings, Japanese people will be confused by the difference between Gecko and other UAs. E.g., now, WinIE6 and Opera8.5 don't support JIS X 0212 on EUC-JP that is 3 bytes per a charcter.(Gecko and KHTML are supporting it.) By this reason, the *users* of some EUC-JP sites are confused. The Gecko and KHTML users can post and read the JIS X 0212 characters on EUC-JP sites. But many users(i.e., WinIE users) cannot post and read it. Therefore, JIS X 0213 on JA local encodings will make trouble for JA lang users. JIS X 0213 should be supported on UTF-8. I think that it's enough for Japanese people on the (current) internet.
If this bug wants to fix this, we should mark to WONTFIX.
Please clarify what should be fixed by this bug.
If nobody answer to my question, I'll mark to WONTFIX this bug.
Whiteboard: Mozilla Japan think that JIS X 0213 should not be supported by Japanese local encodings.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
What about bug 144891?
I agree with you that we don't have to support JIS X 0213 encodings for web page or e-mail.
However we need JIS X 0213 converter to support JIS X 0213 font on UNIX even if external encoding is only Unicode.
IMO we should seek the opinions of Japanese Linux users' community before marking WONTFIX.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Yeah, but if bug 144891 needs JIS X 0213 converter, I think that it should be created on bug 144891, so not on this bug. I think that this bug is to expand JA local encodings. If so, we don't need this bug.
I don't deny to fix bug 144891.
# If we need to expand the encodings, this bug is a step of fixing bug 144891.
# But not so. We don't need to expand it. Therefore, this bug will be never
# FIXED. So, this bug will be blocking bug 144891 forever.
# This is not a good state for bug 144891.
# We should clarify this bug's state for bug 144891.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
According to comment #0, this is a meta bug to track JIS X 0213 related issue.
Therefore it's reasonable that this blocks bug 144891.
Of course, if you think that it's overkill to open meta bug to track only one bug, feel free to close this :-)
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Thanks, I didn't understand this is a meta bug (because the keywords doesn't have meta keyword).
O.K. I'm closing this bug as INVA. This is not a good meta bug.
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> What about bug 144891?
> However we need JIS X 0213 converter to support JIS X 0213 font on UNIX even if
> external encoding is only Unicode.
> IMO we should seek the opinions of Japanese Linux users' community before
> marking WONTFIX.
Linux user community can't care less these days. Virtually no one uses XLFD-based X11 core fonts. Linux users just use truetype and opentype fonts with fontconfig and Xft.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•