Open
Bug 734077
Opened 12 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
mochitest-chrome: 'test_chromeWorkerJSM.xul > WorkerTest_subworker.js' miss to actually use its chromeURL variable
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P5)
Core
DOM: Core & HTML
Tracking
()
NEW
mozilla14
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
This should be (part of) the fix, based on comment in the file. But I get [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20120126 Firefox/12.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.9a1] (custom debug build for Windows 2000) { 2 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/dom/workers/te st/test_chromeWorkerJSM.xul | Worker had an error: uncaught exception: DOMExcept ion: INVALID_STATE_ERR } ... :-/
Attachment #604060 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
Attachment #604060 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie) from comment #1) > [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20120126 Firefox/12.0a1 > SeaMonkey/2.9a1] (custom debug build for Windows 2000) [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20120104 Firefox/12.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.9a1] (nightly, 2012-01-04-00-30-16-comm-central-trunk) in fact.
Comment on attachment 604060 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Load chromeURL (not mochitestURL) through XHR Review of attachment 604060 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/workers/test/WorkerTest_subworker.js @@ +12,5 @@ > "http://mochi.test:8888/tests"); > > // We should be able to XHR to anything we want, including a chrome URL. > let xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); > + xhr.open("GET", chromeURL, false); Rather than replacing this can you also make sure that we can xhr to the mochitestURL *and* the chrome URL?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie) from comment #1) > But I get > [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20120126 Firefox/12.0a1 > SeaMonkey/2.9a1] (custom debug build for Windows 2000) > { > 2 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | > chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/dom/workers/te > st/test_chromeWorkerJSM.xul | Worker had an error: uncaught exception: > DOMExcept > ion: INVALID_STATE_ERR > } > ... :-/ That was because 'WorkerTest_badworker.js' is a "plain" test file, not a "chrome" test file!
Assignee: nobody → sgautherie.bz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
status-firefox13:
--- → affected
Target Milestone: mozilla13 → mozilla14
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Av1, with comment 3 suggestion(s), and more. [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:13.0a1) Gecko/20120201 Firefox/13.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.10a1] (nightly, 2012-02-01-00-30-09-comm-central-trunk) Please check that the expected test results I added are what they are supposed to be.
Attachment #604060 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #605631 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Attachment #604060 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
Attachment #604060 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 605631 [details] [diff] [review] (Av2) Enhance WorkerTest_subworker.js Ping for review.
Attachment #605631 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
I don't understand what is going on in this bug. What is the problem you are trying to solve? Comment 0 is... not terribly descriptive.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Av2, correctly rewritten. (In reply to Jonas Sicking (:sicking) from comment #7) > What is the problem you are trying to solve? Comment 0 is... not terribly > descriptive. Bug summary tells this test was apparently meant to test a chromeURL too, but missed to actually do so. Eventually, I added more cases, fwiw.
Attachment #605631 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #611675 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
Attachment #611675 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Attachment #605631 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
Attachment #605631 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Comment on attachment 611675 [details] [diff] [review] (Av3) Enhance WorkerTest_subworker.js, Add missing ';' in various files Ok. I think bent needs to review this since I don't know these tests well enough.
Attachment #611675 -
Flags: review?(jonas)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Ping for review.
Comment on attachment 611675 [details] [diff] [review] (Av3) Enhance WorkerTest_subworker.js, Add missing ';' in various files Review of attachment 611675 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry this slipped off my radar. How much of this still works?
Attachment #611675 -
Flags: review?(bent.mozilla)
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Comment 13•2 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee is inactive on Bugzilla, so the assignee is being reset.
Assignee: bugzillamozillaorg_serge_20140323 → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•