739783 - Update licensing references on the website for MPL2

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Camino Graveyard :: Product Site, defect)

Description

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

Now that our code is MPL2, we need to update licensing references on the website.

I don't think there's anything outside of /legal/, and the changes there should be small.

Comment 1

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

Attachment: Proposed changes

Here are the changes.

I've also updated the relevant license headers sections of http://wiki.caminobrowser.org/Development:Coding to reflect use of MPL2.

Comment 2

[Samuel Sidler (:ss)]

Comment on attachment 610303 [details] [diff] [review]
Proposed changes

I don't really like this sentence...

  Beginning with Camino 2.1.3, this is version 2.0 of the MPL, while...

The "this is" part reads really weird. How about:

  Camino 2.1.3 and later use version 2.0 of the MPL, while...

Is there a reason you wrote the sentence in a different way for the source code section vs slightly modifying the first sentence? Repetition? It's fine how it is, just curious.

r=me with the changes above.

(And no, not caught up on bugmail, just saw this review request go by.)

Comment 3

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

(In reply to Samuel Sidler (:ss) from comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 610303 [details] [diff] [review]
> Proposed changes
> 
> I don't really like this sentence...
> 
>   Beginning with Camino 2.1.3, this is version 2.0 of the MPL, while...

Me either ;-)

> The "this is" part reads really weird. How about:
> 
>   Camino 2.1.3 and later use version 2.0 of the MPL, while...

That sounds good.

> Is there a reason you wrote the sentence in a different way for the source
> code section vs slightly modifying the first sentence? Repetition? It's fine
> how it is, just curious.

The two sections were already different (binaries already mentioned versions, and were divided into paragraphs on that basis, while source code just used one pgh; different positions of the links, etc.).

So for the binaries, I wanted to keep the parallel structure between 2.x and 1.x as much as possible, without rewriting the whole section, whereas for the source code, I could just change the link text and append the parenthetical about pre-2.1.3.

> (And no, not caught up on bugmail, just saw this review request go by.)

:-)  Still the fastest review I've gotten in months ;-)

Comment 4

[Samuel Sidler (:ss)]

Given the current state of the Camino project, we won't be fixing these website bugs. Mass changing our Product Site bugs (search on "camino-website-bugs").

RESOLVED -> WONTFIX.