Closed Bug 739884 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

decomtaminate impl of UnselectRow() and UnselectCol() on accessible tables

Categories

(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla15

People

(Reporter: tbsaunde, Assigned: maxli)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [good first bug][mentor=eitan@mozilla.com][lang=c++])

Attachments

(1 file, 3 obsolete files)

same procedure as bug 739882 but with UnselectRow() and UnselectColumn()
Attached patch Patch v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → maxli
Attachment #617152 - Flags: review?(eitan)
Comment on attachment 617152 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 >+xpcAccessibleTable::UnselectColumn(PRInt32 aColIdx) >+{ >+ if (!mTable) >+ return NS_ERROR_FAILURE; >+ >+ mTable->UnselectCol(aColIdx); you should check that the row index argument is valid as in >= 0 and < RowCount() and return NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG if it isn't >+ return NS_OK; >+} >+ >+nsresult >+xpcAccessibleTable::UnselectRow(PRInt32 aRowIdx) >+{ >+ if (!mTable) >+ return NS_ERROR_FAILURE; >+ >+ mTable->UnselectRow(aRowIdx); same >+void >+nsXULListboxAccessible::UnselectRow(PRUint32 aRowIdx) > { >- if (IsDefunct()) >- return NS_ERROR_FAILURE; >- > nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement> control = > do_QueryInterface(mContent); >- NS_ASSERTION(control, >- "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement."); keep the assert > nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMXULSelectControlItemElement> item; >- control->GetItemAtIndex(aRow, getter_AddRefs(item)); >- NS_ENSURE_TRUE(item, NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG); >- >- return control->RemoveItemFromSelection(item); >-} >- >-NS_IMETHODIMP >-nsXULListboxAccessible::UnselectColumn(PRInt32 aColumn) >-{ >- // xul:listbox and xul:richlistbox support row selection only. >- return NS_OK; >+ >+ if(control) { I'm not sure you need to add the if, but if you are adding an if please keep nsCOMPtr<foo> item inside the if.
Attachment #617152 - Flags: review?(eitan) → review?(trev.saunders)
Comment on attachment 617152 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 please fix comment 2 then rerequest review
Attachment #617152 - Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Attached patch Patch v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #617152 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #618494 - Flags: review?(trev.saunders)
Comment on attachment 618494 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 Alex, I'm busy till friday afternoon atleast mind taking this?
Attachment #618494 - Flags: review?(trev.saunders) → review?(surkov.alexander)
Comment on attachment 618494 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2 Review of attachment 618494 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: accessible/src/generic/ARIAGridAccessible.h @@ +66,5 @@ > NS_DECL_OR_FORWARD_NSIACCESSIBLETABLE_WITH_XPCACCESSIBLETABLE > > + // TableAccessible > + virtual void UnselectCol(PRUint32 aColIdx); > + virtual void UnselectRow(PRUint32 aRowIdx); move them to existing TableAccessible section ::: accessible/src/html/nsHTMLTableAccessible.h @@ +133,5 @@ > virtual PRUint32 RowCount(); > virtual void Summary(nsString& aSummary); > virtual bool IsProbablyLayoutTable(); > + virtual void UnselectCol(PRUint32 aColIdx); > + virtual void UnselectRow(PRUint32 aRowIdx); keep them in order of TableAccessible.h ::: accessible/src/xpcom/xpcAccessibleTable.h @@ +27,5 @@ > nsresult GetRowCount(PRInt32* aRowCount); > nsresult GetSummary(nsAString& aSummary); > nsresult IsProbablyForLayout(bool* aIsForLayout); > + nsresult UnselectColumn(PRInt32 aColIdx); > + nsresult UnselectRow(PRInt32 aRowIdx); keep it in the order of TableAccessibe.h ::: accessible/src/xul/nsXULListboxAccessible.cpp @@ +782,5 @@ > do_QueryInterface(mContent); > NS_ASSERTION(control, > "Doesn't implement nsIDOMXULMultiSelectControlElement."); > > + if(control) { space after if
Attachment #618494 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander) → review+
Attached patch Patch v3 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
fixed nits
Attachment #618494 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #618616 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Attached patch Patch v3.1Splinter Review
sorry, missed one
Attachment #618616 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #618616 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Attachment #618617 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Comment on attachment 618617 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v3.1 thank you! r=me
Attachment #618617 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: