Comment 1 Dave Camp (:dcamp) 2012-04-04 16:19:53 PDT

Created attachment 612391 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Comment 2 Rob Campbell [:rc] (:robcee) 2012-04-05 09:40:09 PDT

Comment on attachment 612391 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

   toggleHTMLPanel: function TP_toggle()
   {
     if (this.treePanel.isOpen()) {
       this.treePanel.close();
       Services.prefs.setBoolPref("devtools.inspector.htmlPanelOpen", false);
-      this.store.setValue(this.winID, "htmlPanelOpen", false);
+      this.currentInspector._htmlPanelOpen = false;
     } else {
       this.treePanel.open();
       Services.prefs.setBoolPref("devtools.inspector.htmlPanelOpen", true);
-      this.store.setValue(this.winID, "htmlPanelOpen", true);
+      this.currentInspector._htmlPanelOpen = true;
     }
   },

this method still bugs me.

I think we could do something like:

toggleHTMLPanel() {
  let wasClosed = !this.treePanel.isOpen();

  if (wasClosed)
    this.treePanel.open();
  else
    this.treePanel.close();

  Services.prefs.setBoolPref("devtools.inspector.htmlPanelOpen", wasClosed);
  this.store.setValue(this.winID, "htmlPanelOpen", wasClosed);
  this.currentInspector._htmlPanelOpen = wasClosed;
}

I'm not sure this is worth the change or if this is more or less confusing than the duplicated methods though. Dealer's choice.

-    this._currentInspector = new Inspector(this);
+    this.initializeStore();

I thought we were getting rid of InspectorStore...

I see what you did there. Repurposing it to store the inspector instances. Looks good.

does browser_inspector_tab_switch.js just work with this new implementation? If so, that's pretty sweet.

Should probably send it through try before landing.

Comment 3 Dave Camp (:dcamp) 2012-04-05 09:48:49 PDT

(In reply to Rob Campbell [:rc] (:robcee) from comment #2)

> this method still bugs me.
> 
> I think we could do something like:
> I'm not sure this is worth the change or if this is more or less confusing
> than the duplicated methods though. Dealer's choice.
> 

Yeah, that makes sense.  I'll do it.

> -    this._currentInspector = new Inspector(this);
> +    this.initializeStore();
> 
> I thought we were getting rid of InspectorStore...
> 
> I see what you did there. Repurposing it to store the inspector instances.
> Looks good.
> 
> does browser_inspector_tab_switch.js just work with this new implementation?
> If so, that's pretty sweet.

On my machine...

> 
> Should probably send it through try before landing.

Indeed.

Comment 4 Dave Camp (:dcamp) 2012-04-16 16:00:09 PDT

Created attachment 615517 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

Unbitrot (jimb and I spent a little while trying to find a reverse of 'rot', but this is the best we could find)

Comment 5 Dave Camp (:dcamp) 2012-04-19 10:23:30 PDT

https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=9bded5c0b43a

Comment 6 Dave Camp (:dcamp) 2012-04-19 12:04:05 PDT

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/db5627efe52f

Comment 7 Tim Taubert [:ttaubert] 2012-04-20 02:00:08 PDT

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/db5627efe52f