Closed
Bug 747847
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
crash in nsJSContext::EvaluateString with Skype extension 5.11
Categories
(Firefox :: Extension Compatibility, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox12 | - | --- |
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: crash, qawanted, Whiteboard: [startupcrash])
Crash Data
It only affects 12.0 and happens on startup. Signature nsJSContext::EvaluateString(nsAString_internal const&, JSObject*, nsIPrincipal*, nsIPrincipal*, char const*, unsigned int, unsigned int, nsAString_internal*, bool*) More Reports Search UUID 6b0c78d7-7d07-4f9f-ad5d-666f12120422 Date Processed 2012-04-22 15:21:31 Uptime 1 Last Crash 7 seconds before submission Install Age 10.8 minutes since version was first installed. Install Time 2012-04-22 15:10:31 Product Firefox Version 12.0 Build ID 20120420145725 Release Channel release OS Windows NT OS Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build Architecture x86 Build Architecture Info GenuineIntel family 6 model 37 stepping 5 Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ Crash Address 0x70796b77 App Notes AdapterVendorID: 0x1002, AdapterDeviceID: 0x95c5, AdapterSubsysID: 03421028, AdapterDriverVersion: 8.951.0.0 D2D? D2D+ DWrite? DWrite+ EMCheckCompatibility False Total Virtual Memory 4294836224 Available Virtual Memory 3992694784 System Memory Use Percentage 43 Available Page File 12732174336 Available Physical Memory 4886888448 Frame Module Signature Source 0 xul.dll nsJSContext::EvaluateString dom/base/nsJSEnvironment.cpp:1437 1 SkypeFfComponent.dll SkypeFfComponent.dll@0x546dc 2 SkypeFfComponent.dll SkypeFfComponent.dll@0x7753e 3 SkypeFfComponent.dll SkypeFfComponent.dll@0x81cc5 4 SkypeFfComponent.dll SkypeFfComponent.dll@0x82093 5 xul.dll NS_InvokeByIndex_P xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/win32/xptcinvoke.cpp:102 6 xul.dll XPC_WN_CallMethod js/xpconnect/src/XPCWrappedNativeJSOps.cpp:1542 7 mozjs.dll js::InvokeKernel js/src/jsinterp.cpp:519 8 mozjs.dll js::Interpret js/src/jsinterp.cpp:2791 9 mozglue.dll je_calloc memory/jemalloc/jemalloc.c:6481 10 mozjs.dll js::RunScript js/src/jsinterp.cpp:466 11 mozjs.dll js::ExecuteKernel js/src/jsinterp.cpp:677 12 mozjs.dll js::Execute js/src/jsinterp.cpp:718 13 mozjs.dll JS_ExecuteScript js/src/jsapi.cpp:5292 14 xul.dll nsJSContext::ExecuteScript dom/base/nsJSEnvironment.cpp:1658 15 xul.dll nsXULDocument::ExecuteScript content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp:3614 16 xul.dll nsXULDocument::ExecuteScript content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp:3635 17 xul.dll nsXULDocument::OnStreamComplete content/xul/document/src/nsXULDocument.cpp:3507 18 xul.dll nsStreamLoader::OnStopRequest netwerk/base/src/nsStreamLoader.cpp:127 19 xul.dll nsJARChannel::OnStopRequest modules/libjar/nsJARChannel.cpp:924 20 xul.dll nsInputStreamPump::OnStateStop netwerk/base/src/nsInputStreamPump.cpp:583 21 xul.dll nsInputStreamPump::OnInputStreamReady netwerk/base/src/nsInputStreamPump.cpp:405 22 xul.dll nsInputStreamReadyEvent::Run xpcom/io/nsStreamUtils.cpp:114 23 xul.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:657 ... It's correlated to Skype 5.11: nsJSContext::EvaluateString(nsAString_internal const&, JSObject*, nsIPrincipal*, nsIPrincipal*, char const*, unsigned int, unsigned int, nsAString_internal*, bool*)|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ (91 crashes) 77% (70/91) vs. 1% (326/40715) {82AF8DCA-6DE9-405D-BD5E-43525BDAD38A} 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (24/40715) 5.10.0.9560 77% (70/91) vs. 1% (239/40715) 5.11.0.9874 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (1/40715) 5.3.0.7550 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (1/40715) 5.6.0.8153 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (33/40715) 5.6.0.8442 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (1/40715) 5.8.0.8855 0% (0/91) vs. 0% (27/40715) 5.9.0.9216 More reports at: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=nsJSContext%3A%3AEvaluateString%28nsAString_internal+const%26%2C+JSObject*%2C+nsIPrincipal*%2C+nsIPrincipal*%2C+char+const*%2C+unsigned+int%2C+unsigned+int%2C+nsAString_internal*%2C+bool*%29
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-firefox12:
--- → ?
![]() |
||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
This jumped from a residual crash to a top-30 crash for 12.* between 2012-04-19 and 2012-04-21, the 20th has 10x the crash volume than the 19th, so either we regressed something in 12.0b6 or there was an add-on release on the 20th that triggered this.
![]() |
||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
It's #17 in 12.0b6 but not in the top 300 for 12.0b5 so it seems to be our regression between those two.
Updated•11 years ago
|
![]() |
||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Looks like it's going pretty low in final again now, #83 in yesterday's data, which was the first full day of 12.0 being released.
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
We've tried to reproduce this but we haven't been able to reproduce it yet. We'll have another update tomorrow morning.
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
I dug out a few manual correlations that might help: nsJSContext::EvaluateString(nsAString_internal const&, JSObject*, nsIPrincipal*, nsIPrincipal*, char const*, unsigned int, unsigned int, nsAString_internal*, bool*)|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_READ (79 crashes) 92% (73/79) vs. 1% (626/73266) {82AF8DCA-6DE9-405D-BD5E-43525BDAD38A} 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (60/73266) 5.10.0.9560 91% (72/79) vs. 1% (445/73266) 5.11.0.9874 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (4/73266) 5.3.0.7280 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (1/73266) 5.3.0.7550 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 5.6.0.8153 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 5.6.0.8312 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (46/73266) 5.6.0.8442 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 5.7.0.8773 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (11/73266) 5.8.0.8855 1% (1/79) vs. 0% (53/73266) 5.9.0.9216 30% (24/79) vs. 9% (6907/73266) {d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d} (Adblock Plus, https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/1865) 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (46/73266) 1.3.10 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (1/73266) 1.3.3 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 1.3.5 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (4/73266) 1.3.9 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (5/73266) 2.0.1 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (4/73266) 2.0.2 30% (24/79) vs. 9% (6837/73266) 2.0.3 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (8/73266) 2.0.4b.3445 18% (14/79) vs. 3% (2326/73266) {37964A3C-4EE8-47b1-8321-34DE2C39BA4D} 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (1/73266) 2.4.0.40 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (1/73266) 2.4.0.54 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (3/73266) 2.5.2.14 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 2.5.2.22 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (26/73266) 2.5.2.32 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (6/73266) 2.5.2.42 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (2/73266) 2.5.2.48 0% (0/79) vs. 0% (20/73266) 2.5.2.54 18% (14/79) vs. 3% (2254/73266) 2.5.2.66
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
I have been trying to reproduce on XP and Skype Click to Call version 5.11.0.9874 (the one with the higher correlation) going through different scenarios like installing in Fx11betas, upgrading by installing Fx12betas, installing AdBlock Plus, AVG Security Toolbar. No success so far.
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
I tried as well to reproduce on Win XP, but no luck so far using 5.11.0.9874.
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
In the last week, this signature has 668 crashes.
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Fairly low crasher, so untracking for FF12. I am, however, including Lilian Rincon who may be able to help track this crash down on the Skype side.
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
WONTFIX: even recent reports are Fx 12.0 only
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•