755928 - [research] build list of views that take > 800ms (HTTP GET only)

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(support.mozilla.org :: Code Quality, task, P1)

Description

[Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me]

This bug is for going through the graphs and building a list of GET views in kitsune that take > 800ms.

Comment 1

[Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky]]

I did most of this today. I am leaving it open until I file the followup bugs. Below are my notes.

Landing pages:
stats.timers.sumo.view.landings.views.*.GET.upper_90 : all <50ms

KB:
stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.*.GET.upper_90 : mostly good.
stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.document.GET.upper_90 : <100ms
stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.revision.GET.upper_90 : varies between ~500ms and ~1000ms
stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.get_helpful_votes_async.GET.upper_90 : all over the place from <1s to almost 25s. It is an ajax call to populate an optional chart and not used much so I don't think it is very low priority if any.
stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.review_revision.GET.upper_90 : has some peaks up to 1500ms. This is a page for KB reviewers. I think it is medium to low priority to fix. I am guessing the generating diffs is what slows it down. We could potentially cheat and do that in js on demand.

Support Forum:
stats.timers.sumo.view.questions.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good except…
stats.timers.sumo.view.questions.views.questions.GET.upper_90 : 750ms - 2s. high priority
stats.timers.sumo.view.questions.views.edit_answer.GET.upper_90 : 500ms - 3s. low priority

Search:
stats.timers.sumo.view.search.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Forums:
stats.timers.sumo.view.forums.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Users (profile page, etc):
stats.timers.sumo.view.users.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Private Messages:
stats.timers.sumo.view.messages.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Groups:
stats.timers.sumo.view.groups.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good except
stats.timers.sumo.view.groups.views.profile.GET.upper_90 : all over the place up to ~15secs. Probably medium priority to fix.

Gallery:
stats.timers.sumo.view.gallery.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Dashboards:
stats.timers.sumo.view.dashboards.views.localization.GET.upper_90 : some peaks up to 2secs
stats.timers.sumo.view.dashboards.views.contributors.GET.upper_90 : mostly good with some peaks above 1-2secs

KBForums:
stats.timers.sumo.view.kbforums.views.*.GET.upper_90 : good

Comment 2

[Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky]]

Followup bugs have been filed.

(In reply to Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky] from comment #1)
> stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.get_helpful_votes_async.GET.upper_90 : all
> over the place from <1s to almost 25s. It is an ajax call to populate an
> optional chart and not used much so I don't think it is very low priority if
> any.
Bug 761314

> stats.timers.sumo.view.wiki.views.review_revision.GET.upper_90 : has some
> peaks up to 1500ms. This is a page for KB reviewers. I think it is medium to
> low priority to fix. I am guessing the generating diffs is what slows it
> down. We could potentially cheat and do that in js on demand.
Bug 761316

> stats.timers.sumo.view.questions.views.questions.GET.upper_90 : 750ms - 2s.
> high priority
Bug 674304

> stats.timers.sumo.view.questions.views.edit_answer.GET.upper_90 : 500ms -
> 3s. low priority
Bug 761317

> stats.timers.sumo.view.groups.views.profile.GET.upper_90 : all over the
> place up to ~15secs. Probably medium priority to fix.
Bug 761320