Closed
Bug 756383
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
make nsHTMLAnchorElement::IsHTMLFocusable faster
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Core
DOM: Core & HTML
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla15
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.50 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
in example of bug 732872 it takes up to 11% because of URI computation. Cached URI usage should help.
Attachment #625024 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625024 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
I'm not familiar with Link. Jonas and Boris should know it better,
based on blame.
Attachment #625024 -
Flags: review?(bugs) → review?(jonas)
Comment on attachment 625024 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
I won't have time to get to this anytime soon. Checking with bz.
Attachment #625024 -
Flags: review?(jonas) → review?(bzbarsky)
![]() |
||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625024 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Wouldn't it make more sense to move the cache check into IsLink()?
Attachment #625024 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #3)
> Wouldn't it make more sense to move the cache check into IsLink()?
IsLink is a virtual method and takes an argument we don't need what makes us a little bit slower than we could be. Good example how minor stuffs can make a difference I've got is bug 756381 where we lost 3% perf on nsCOMPtr things.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #3)
> Comment on attachment 625024 [details] [diff] [review]
> patch
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to move the cache check into IsLink()?
in case if I misread you: I can fix IsLink() while I'm here but I would avoid to use it for IsHTMLFocusable implementation.
![]() |
||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625024 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
OK, r=me. I'm still planning to rip out all this stuff anyway...
Attachment #625024 -
Flags: review- → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky (:bz) from comment #6)
> OK, r=me. I'm still planning to rip out all this stuff anyway...
ok, cool since these stuffs are crazy a little bit (I guess because old and new code share the same room).
Then I'm leaving IsLink untouched for now.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla15
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•