Closed
Bug 75706
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Some GBK characters can not be displayed correctly in Solaris Trunk
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla0.9.1
People
(Reporter: eyan, Assigned: ftang)
Details
(Keywords: intl, Whiteboard: depend on 80772 expect date 5/17)
I verified the diplay of GBK characters in Solaris Trunk, and I find some problems: All the GBK characters display OK, except: 0xa2a1 --> 0xa2aa displayed as NULL 0xa6e0 --> 0xa6f5 displayed as NULL 0xa8a2 --> 0xa8c0 displayed as NULL 0xa989 --> 0xa995 displayed as '?' and in zh.GBK locale, the size of the characters are not the same. but in zh.UTF-8 locale, the size is the same. see also: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60826
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Katakai san, can you reproduce this?
Summary: Some GBK characters can not be displayed correctly in Solaris Trunk → Some GBK characters can not be displayed correctly in Solaris Trunk
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
reassign to ftang and target moz9.1
Assignee: nhotta → ftang
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.1
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Add Brian@Netscape in Cc
Updated•23 years ago
|
QA Contact: andreasb → ylong
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
Ftang - Is this important for nsbeta1? Is this a requirement from the Sun team? Please Advise . . . Adding Lbaliman to cc: list.
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Sun says this is not a show-stopper
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Good, then we do not need this one for nsbeta1. Let's minus it for beta, and assign a milestone after M0.9.1
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
The ucvcn is pretty massy right now. I clean up it to fix bug 75928. Hope that will also fix this one.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
This could be caused by the buggy ucvcn converters. wait and see what happen after we land 75928
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Whiteboard: depend on 80772 expect date 5/17
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
It should be fixed, right now. reopen if you still see the same problem. IF you see different problem- please file new bug. recycle bug report will confuse people
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Verified in Mozilla nightly build 2001052210: 0xa2a1 --> 0xa2aa displayed OK. 0xa6e0 --> 0xa6f5 displayed OK. 0xa8a2 --> 0xa8c0 displayed OK. but still some problems exsist. 0xa989 --> 0xa995 displayed as '?' (exist in old build) 0xa8bc and 0xa8bf displayed as '?' (new in latest build) 0xfe50 --> 0xfea0 displayed as '?' (new in latest build)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
Verified in Mozilla 2001061410 on Solaris: in zh_CN.GB18030 locale, all OK. But in zh_CN.GBK locale: 0xa8bc and 0xa8bf displayed as '?' 0xa989 --> 0xa995 displayed as '?' 0xfe50 --> 0xfea0 displayed as '?'
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
Ervin, The solaris locale is not important for Mozilla folks. What are your font setting on Mozilla? which fonts are available on your environment?
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
I use gbk-0 font for zh-CN environment in my Solaris machine.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•