Closed Bug 758573 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Port |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| to SeaMonkey

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect, P4)

Tracking

(seamonkey2.9 wontfix, seamonkey2.10 wontfix, seamonkey2.11 fixed, seamonkey2.12 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
seamonkey2.13
Tracking Status
seamonkey2.9 --- wontfix
seamonkey2.10 --- wontfix
seamonkey2.11 --- fixed
seamonkey2.12 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: sgautherie)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

No description provided.
Flags: in-testsuite-
Comment on attachment 627180 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5 & 6] I doubt the removed-files.in additions for "non omnijar" cases have as much benefit as they once did. Happy to hear of a reason why you think so though. Either way, not rushing on this for our last beta.
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-beta?
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
(In reply to Justin Wood (:Callek) from comment #2) > I doubt the removed-files.in additions for "non omnijar" cases have as much > benefit as they once did. I concur. > Happy to hear of a reason why you think so though. See bug 758567 comment 3...
Attachment #627180 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-beta?
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-beta?
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-beta+
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #627180 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
There is a list of bugs I just approved for beta (though we're on our last beta now, with the release spinning friday or sat) which touch this same file (removed-files.in) This is one of those bugs where I could not find a way to apply it to beta, even after mixing and matching the order here repeatedly. Please either provide one monolithic patch which makes someones life easier, convince someone to untangle, tell us the order, or do it yourself. Otherwise I am comfortable with these slipping from this release. I won't even attempt to land these patches on aurora for the same reasons without one of the above solutions being done.
Comment on attachment 627180 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5 & 6] http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/4b53d8410a36
Attachment #627180 - Attachment description: (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| → (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5]
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: seamonkey2.12 → seamonkey2.13
Comment on attachment 627180 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5 & 6] http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-aurora/rev/6df4049779a9 http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta/rev/4e8f318e67c9
Attachment #627180 - Attachment description: (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5] → (Av1) Update packaging after |Bug 669547 - Fix AsyncResource (or provide an alternative) to have better callback semantics| [Checked in: Comment 5 & 6]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: