Closed
Bug 759868
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
xpcom example 'extends' wrong?
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: Documentation, defect, P1)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
1.9
People
(Reporter: glind, Assigned: wbamberg)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → 1.8
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → wbamberg
Lets punt on this to 1.9's cycle.
Target Milestone: 1.8 → 1.9
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Pull request 482 (https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/482) from @dcrewi already fixes the examples: this just adds dcrewi to the credits and fixes some other typos.
Attachment #640376 -
Flags: review?(rFobic)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #640376 -
Flags: review?(rFobic) → review-
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: wbamberg → rFobic
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
What's the status here?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: rFobic → wbamberg
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
I'll take this, and hope to get it into 1.10.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
I've rewritten the documentation for xpcom.
A few things came up while doing this:
1) Factory.description does not seem to be updated when I pass the "description" option to its constructor, it just keeps the default value. Is this intentional?
2) There seems to be a bit of inconsistency in the error handling for some of these functions: when Things aren't found, some throw errors, some do nothing or return null. Should we be consistent?
3) I don't understand how this:
Cc[contractId].getService(Ci.nsISupports);
works. Where's that getService() defined? I would like to point to its definition from the docs.
Thanks for the review!
Attachment #640376 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #659404 -
Flags: review?(rFobic)
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 659404 [details]
a new pull request
This documentation is great, thanks Will!!
I also put few suggestion comments, I'm leaving it up to you to decide.
Attachment #659404 -
Flags: review?(rFobic) → review+
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/2f21eccea449a3e383e11aa69c91b54d85d7f700
Merge pull request #484 from wbamberg/759868
Bug 759868 - xpcom example 'extends' wrong?
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Commit pushed to stabilization at https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/c3aec726eff8287aeb1d031c2920c8855e518ad4
Merge pull request #484 from wbamberg/759868
Bug 759868 - xpcom example 'extends' wrong?(cherry picked from commit 2f21eccea449a3e383e11aa69c91b54d85d7f700)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•