Closed
Bug 766528
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Allow customizing the time tracking field labels
Categories
(Bugzilla :: User Interface, enhancement)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 4.4
People
(Reporter: pami.ketolainen, Assigned: pami.ketolainen)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
2.23 KB,
patch
|
LpSolit
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The field labels on show bug page can be customized by overriding the field description in "hook/global/field-descs-end.none.tmpl"
However, the time tracking fields do not use the common bug/field* templates and so they do not reflect the changes made in that template hook.
This prevents for example changing the "hours" to something else.
Attached is a patch to change the templates so that field-descs values are also used for the time tracking fields. It simply replaces the hard coded labels with '[% INCLUDE "bug/field-label.html.tmpl" ...'
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #634859 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: general → ui
Blocks: 575211
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Bugzilla-General → User Interface
Ever confirmed: true
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 4.4
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 634859 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
>+ [% INCLUDE "bug/field-label.html.tmpl"
>+ field = bug_fields.estimated_time
>+ %]
This looks good, but you also have to pass editable = 1 to all these directives as all users who can see these fields can also edit them.
Attachment #634859 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #1)
> Comment on attachment 634859 [details] [diff] [review]
> v1
>
> >+ [% INCLUDE "bug/field-label.html.tmpl"
> >+ field = bug_fields.estimated_time
> >+ %]
>
> This looks good, but you also have to pass editable = 1 to all these
> directives as all users who can see these fields can also edit them.
Ok, I wasn't exactly sure if editable is needed. In field-label.html.tmpl it only seems to affect whether the description is wrapped in <label> tag.
Should they also have some accesskey?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Added the editable = 1
Leaving out the accesskey, as it's probably a different story to decide whether those fields need access key, and what would be the appropriate one for each.
Attachment #634859 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #634904 -
Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 634904 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
>=== modified file 'template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl'
>- <th>
>- %Complete
>- </th>
This can be replaced by bug_fields.percentage_complete too. Otherwise looks good and works fine. r=LpSolit
Attachment #634904 -
Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: ui → pami.ketolainen
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: approval+
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Thanks for your contribution. :)
Committing to: bzr+ssh://lpsolit%40gmail.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/
modified template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl
modified template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl
Committed revision 8272.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•