Closed
Bug 766865
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Invalid index <n>, size is <n> at java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsException(ArrayList.java) at org.mozilla.gecko.TabsTray$TabsAdapter.addTab(TabsTray.java)
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(firefox15 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 16
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox15 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Assigned: mbrubeck)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, Whiteboard: [native-crash])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.04 KB,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
akeybl
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There's one crash in 16.0a1/20120620: bp-f0dca13d-e00a-4618-858f-22afc2120620.
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Invalid index -1, size is 4
at java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsException(ArrayList.java:255)
at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:147)
at org.mozilla.gecko.TabsTray$TabsAdapter.addTab(TabsTray.java:224)
at org.mozilla.gecko.TabsTray.onTabChanged(TabsTray.java:130)
at org.mozilla.gecko.Tabs.notifyListeners(Tabs.java:355)
at org.mozilla.gecko.Tabs.notifyListeners(Tabs.java:346)
at org.mozilla.gecko.Tabs$1.run(Tabs.java:69)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:587)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:92)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:132)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:4123)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:491)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:841)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:599)
at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method)
More reports at:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/query/query?product=FennecAndroid&query_search=signature&query_type=contains&query=java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsException&do_query=1
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
This looks like a regression caused by http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b7d5c0ed0d26.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
It looks like this can happen if a tab is added but then removed immediately, before the ADDED notification is processed.
It might also be possible for the index to be too large, if some other tabs was closed right after this one was added, before the notification is processed. This patch checks for that scenario too.
Attachment #635405 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 635405 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
(In reply to Matt Brubeck (:mbrubeck) from comment #2)
> It might also be possible for the index to be too large, if some other tabs
> was closed right after this one was added, before the notification is
> processed. This patch checks for that scenario too.
If some other tab was closed but this one was added, I believe we'd still want to be adding this new tab to the TabsAdapter. We could just make sure to add the tab at the end in this case, but this makes me worry that it's also possible to be inserting tabs at the wrong index (e.g, you have multiple tabs, we add a tab somewhere in the middle, and the first tab gets deleted before the ADDED notification gets processed).
It sounds to me like we need a more robust way to make sure we're adding the tab to the right place in TabsAdapter, but I'm not certain of a good approach. Perhaps add the index to the data passed along with the TabEvents.ADDED notification, but this still wouldn't help with races with CLOSED events. Maybe this is just something we can look into more when the adapter updates from bug 757198 finally land.
r- for now to make sure we add the new tab if it does indeed exist. We can just adjust the index to add it at the end if the index is too large.
Attachment #635405 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Margaret Leibovic [:margaret] from comment #3)
> r- for now to make sure we add the new tab if it does indeed exist. We can
> just adjust the index to add it at the end if the index is too large.
Fixed in this version.
Attachment #635405 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #635453 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #635453 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 635453 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/039721acef47
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): bug 765805
User impact if declined: crash when tabs open and close rapidly
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Landed on inbound June 21
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Low-risk mobile patch that just adds a bounds-check before an array insertion.
String or UUID changes made by this patch: None.
Attachment #635453 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 16
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Invalid index -1, size is 4 at java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsException(ArrayList.java)] → [@ java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Invalid index -1, size is 4 at java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsException(ArrayList.java)]
[@ java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Invalid index 4 size is 1 at java.util.ArrayList.throwIndexOutOfBoundsExcep…
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 635453 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
[Triage Comment]
Low risk crash regression fix. Approved for Aurora 15.
Attachment #635453 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
status-firefox15:
--- → fixed
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•