Open Bug 774136 Opened 12 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Interactive settings wizard for mach

Categories

(Firefox Build System :: Mach Core, enhancement)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: gps, Unassigned)

References

(Depends on 1 open bug, Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Whiteboard: [mach])

My intention for mach is for it to have an interactive wizard to control settings.

We should add a "settings" sub-command (or similar) that allows to settings to be viewed and manipulated. Basically, we should never force someone to look at the raw config file manually.

The first time mach is used and there is no settings file defined or present on the system, it should enter an interactive wizard. I think the flow should be, "This is what I chose for the default settings. Is this OK? (Y/N)"

If the user hits "N," they go to a very basic wizard:

  What application do you want to build?
    1) Firefox
    2) Fenec
    3) Boot to Gecko

  Debug or release? d/r:

  See advanced settings? y/n:

We do some of this presentation today. But, there is no interactive control. We need to add that.

I think it would be cool if there were a more advanced UI for the settings. e.g. a Tcl/Tk interface. But, that is beyond the scope of this bug.

Bug 774135 talks about making changes to the config/settings backend and could impact this work.
Component: Build Config → mach
> I think it would be cool if there were a more advanced UI for the settings. e.g. a Tcl/Tk interface. But, that is beyond the scope of this bug.

Um....why not HTML/WSGI?
Python has a built-in HTTP server. I'd be down if this wizard fired up an HTTP server and did everything through HTML :)

Of course, we need settings to control first...
Then what would be the default configuration ?
This already exists to some extant in http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/tools/mercurial/mach_commands.py#22 (see MercurialSetupWizard), but it goes down a different path than the original comment.
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.