browserid: QA and deploy BrowserID train-2012.07.30 to production

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Cloud Services
Operations: Deployment Requests
RESOLVED FIXED
5 years ago
5 years ago

People

(Reporter: lloyd, Assigned: gene)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Whiteboard: [qa+])

(Reporter)

Description

5 years ago
Version: a2d6744 (0.2012.07.30.1)

available here: https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/tree/train-2012.07.30

Tests pass: http://travis-ci.org/#!/mozilla/browserid/jobs/2003887 

ChangeLog including issues resolved: 
https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/blob/train-2012.07.30/ChangeLog#L1-2

[QA] Suggested additional areas of focus for QA:
  * test that emails look good across lots of email clients

[ops] deployment issues:
  * no difference from 2012.07.20
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
QA Contact: jbonacci
(Assignee)

Comment 1

5 years ago
Per jbonacci, holding on deployment until we have resolution of some 5-star bugs
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Yea, not to block another train but three questions:
1. Do we want to include any of the open 5-star for this train?
2. Can we sweep the recent closed 5-star and make sure they were part of some recent train? If not, do we want to add these as well?
For the 6 5-star that are open:

These two exist in train-2012.07.30:
    #2183 [ie8] train-2012.07.20 js exception when signing in
    #2179 going from /signin to /forgot via the "is this your address?" link redirects the user back to /signin

I believe these two are only on dev?
    #2194 IE8-10 exception on dev.123done.org 
    #2171 IE8: exceptions thrown in bidbundle.js

For these two, are code changes needed to address there?
    #2147 L10n preview is not updating
    #2097 login.persona.org/verify can be used as a verifier
I do this on each train but never note it in the deploy bugs. I've run the frontend
tests for train-2012.07.30 using a local dev instance and they pass for:

winxp:        ie8, ff-14, chrome-20, opera-12.00, safari-5.1.7
win7:         ie9, ff-14, chrome-20, opera-12.00, safari-5.1.7
osx-10.7:     ff-14, chrome-20, opera-12.00, safari-6.0
ubuntu-11.10: ff-14, chrome-20, opera-12.00
ios-5.1:      safari-5.1 (1100s)
android-4.1:  stock (470s), chrome-18 (1680s), ff-14 (110s)
android-2.2:  stock (790s), ff-14 (205s)

Also, I noted the times on mobile which were not done under particularly
controlled conditions, but are representative on my mobile devices. (Desktop
times are usually under a minute, except IE8).
Here are the final Verifications carried over from the 2012.07.20 train:
* 1909: Static process
* 1757: Create new process for serving static or "cacheable" resources
* 2019: Minimalist implementation of support in core for Proxy IDP (a.k.a. "BigTent")
* 1862: Translate the main site
* 1824: mixed language in dialog
* 2093: Train-2012.07.20 l10n issues
* 1954: setting a timeout for provisioning of 20s
* 1570: Certificate provisioning doesn't time out
* 2109: returnTo, siteName, and siteLogo only should work with the observer API
* 2086: siteName and siteLogo not scrubbed from id.get()
(Assignee)

Comment 6

5 years ago
browserid-server-0.2012.07.30-1.el6_107924.x86_64 has been installed on l10n preview
OK. For this train, we will be working off an ephemeral deploy rather than Stage deploy. 

RP/Client: train0730.123done.org
Server: https://train0730.personatest.org/

That (the server) is just the same as any awsbox deploy with two small config changes in /home/app/config.json :
"kpi_backend_sample_rate": 0,
"enable_development_menu": false,
Correction: 
RP/Client: http://train0730.123done.org
Depends on: 768169
For QA:
Release wiki:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Browser_Technologies/Services/Releases/BrowserID_07302012

Test Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0As8GUPwNNWMFdHprZ3lXR0l2ekxXOEU3M3djb01FQ1E#gid=0
Closed 5-Star that need to be Verified by QA
(some may be newer than this train, so should be moved to the ChangeLog for the next train)


2171: IE8: exceptions thrown in bidbundle.js
2165: compile-json.sh breaks stage deployment
2132: 'checking with email provider' permanently shown when cancelling out of forgot password screen 
2088: error when verifying email addition in second browser
2086: siteName and siteLogo not scrubbed from id.get()
2072: prod: FFx 14 - b.setStagedOnBehalfOf exception thrown when closing window
1998: dev/staging: /cookies_disabled content collapsed on mobile
1937: signup of primary on main site /signup fails (404 on static.dev.anosrep.org/lib/winchan.js) 
1934: Signup as primary via the dialog does not work.
1872: templates are not making it into compiled resources.
1829: https://eyedee.me/api/cert_key returning 500 Internal Server Error
1828: double submit of /wsapi/stage_user on main site signup
1813: enter key causes forms to submit twice in Chrome and Firefox
1642: dev: scripts/compress is broken
1638: Dev/Stage: No longer able to sign into *myfavoriteshow.org as new user
1608: dbwriter did not auto-reconnect to mysql master
1554: IE/dev: bidbundle.js uses 'const' which causes exception to be thrown
(Reporter)

Comment 11

5 years ago
train-2012.07.30.3 is available, fixes IE8 issues, see changelog.

https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/tree/train-2012.07.30 - sha 8229af44bb
https://train0730.personatest.org/ is updated to current train-2012.07.30

Note: while logged in state now persists correctly on reload/restart the original issue of an exception on IE8 from github 2183 is still there on this branch.
(Assignee)

Comment 13

5 years ago
staging, l10n-preview and client[4-9] have been updated to 8229af44bb
(Reporter)

Comment 14

5 years ago
train-2012.07.30.4 is available, fixes another IE8 issue #2206


https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/tree/train-2012.07.30 5cfd2d9
:jrgm can you update your emphemeral instance to 5cfd2d9?

:gene is it worth updating stage, l10n?

Also, :gene client[4-9] have gone offline for rebuilds by ckolos
Can you create BID installs in /opt to client[11-30] instead ?
(yea that is a lot of clients!)
https://train0730.personatest.org has been updated on train-2012.07.30 and /ver.txt is now '5cfd2d9 update ChangeLog and version with fix for issue #2206'
(Assignee)

Comment 17

5 years ago
> :gene is it worth updating stage, l10n?
Don't know. If you'd like me to update stage to this version let me know and I'll do so.

> Can you create BID installs in /opt to client[11-30] instead ?
(yea that is a lot of clients!)

I can deploy train-2012.06.22 onto those client machines if you'd like. Would you like me to deploy that train to 11-30?
:gene yea I think we should try to keep Stage (or at least :jrgm 's temp Stage emphemeral stuff) and clients in sync with the same build.
(Reporter)

Updated

5 years ago
Blocks: 783725
(Assignee)

Updated

5 years ago
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.