Closed
Bug 781574
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Valid e-mail address considered invalid and vice versa
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: kevin.lesenechal, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1
Build ID: 20120717181344
Steps to reproduce:
I tried to enter some e-mail address in a <input type="email" />.
Actual results:
Some valid address (RFC 3696) are considered invalid, and some invalid address considered valid.
Valid adress considered as invalid:
– "Abc@def"@example.com
– "Fred Bloggs"@example.com
– "Joe.\\Blow"@example.com
– user@[IPv6:2001:db8:1ff::a0b:dbd0]
– "very.(),:;<>[]\".VERY.\"very@\\ \"very\".unusual"@strange.example.com
– "()<>[]:,;@\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~ ? ^_`{}|~.a"@example.org
– ""@example.org
Invalid address considered as valid:
– Abc.@example.com
– Abc..123@example.com
Expected results:
Valid address according to RFC 3696 should be considered as valid and invalid as invalid.
|
Reporter | |
Updated•13 years ago
|
Severity: normal → trivial
Component: Untriaged → Web Apps
|
||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → DOM: Core & HTML
Product: Firefox → Core
|
||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
RFC 3696 is not the document we're interested in following here.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
|
||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Ms2ger, _is_ there a spec for what should be valid here?
|
|
||
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Yep, the kitchen sink: <http://www.whatwg.org/html/#valid-e-mail-address>.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•