Closed
Bug 781574
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Valid e-mail address considered invalid and vice versa
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: kevin.lesenechal, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1 Build ID: 20120717181344 Steps to reproduce: I tried to enter some e-mail address in a <input type="email" />. Actual results: Some valid address (RFC 3696) are considered invalid, and some invalid address considered valid. Valid adress considered as invalid: – "Abc@def"@example.com – "Fred Bloggs"@example.com – "Joe.\\Blow"@example.com – user@[IPv6:2001:db8:1ff::a0b:dbd0] – "very.(),:;<>[]\".VERY.\"very@\\ \"very\".unusual"@strange.example.com – "()<>[]:,;@\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~ ? ^_`{}|~.a"@example.org – ""@example.org Invalid address considered as valid: – Abc.@example.com – Abc..123@example.com Expected results: Valid address according to RFC 3696 should be considered as valid and invalid as invalid.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Severity: normal → trivial
Component: Untriaged → Web Apps
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → DOM: Core & HTML
Product: Firefox → Core
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
RFC 3696 is not the document we're interested in following here.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Ms2ger, _is_ there a spec for what should be valid here?
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Yep, the kitchen sink: <http://www.whatwg.org/html/#valid-e-mail-address>.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•