Closed
Bug 784122
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Fix Plural Rule #16, Breton, to have 6 forms
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization: Localization, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: mnedeleg, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
The current breton plural rule has the same form for 1, 21, 31, etc.
This form works well if the string has an numeral indicator.
For example, "Remove #1 attachment;Remove #1 attachments" can be localized using the same form for 1, 21, 31, etc :
Lemel 1 c'henstagadur
Lemel 21 c'henstagadur
Lemel 31 c'henstagadur
But if the string to localize doesn't have a numeral indicator, we must have
- a form for 1
- another form for 21, 31, etc.
For example, to localize "Remove attachment;Remove attachments" we must have
"Lemel ar c'henstagadur" for 1
"Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù" for 21, 31, etc...
With 6 forms, the localization for "Remove attachment;Remove attachments" would look like this:
Lemel ar c'henstagadur;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #653471 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #653471 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•