Closed Bug 784122 Opened 13 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Fix Plural Rule #16, Breton, to have 6 forms

Categories

(Core :: Internationalization: Localization, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: mnedeleg, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

The current breton plural rule has the same form for 1, 21, 31, etc. This form works well if the string has an numeral indicator. For example, "Remove #1 attachment;Remove #1 attachments" can be localized using the same form for 1, 21, 31, etc : Lemel 1 c'henstagadur Lemel 21 c'henstagadur Lemel 31 c'henstagadur But if the string to localize doesn't have a numeral indicator, we must have - a form for 1 - another form for 21, 31, etc. For example, to localize "Remove attachment;Remove attachments" we must have "Lemel ar c'henstagadur" for 1 "Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù" for 21, 31, etc... With 6 forms, the localization for "Remove attachment;Remove attachments" would look like this: Lemel ar c'henstagadur;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù;Lemel ar c'henstagadurioù
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Attachment #653471 - Flags: review?(l10n)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: