Closed Bug 785893 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

British English Dictionary (1.19.1) isn't compatible with Firefox 14.0.1

Categories

(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)

14 Branch
x86
Windows Vista
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: chiller004, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/5.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C) Steps to reproduce: Tried to install British English Dictionary (1.19.1) through website & Addons manager. Actual results: I receive an error saying: "British English Dictionary could not be installed because it is not compatible with Firefox14.0.1." Expected results: The version of dictionary I tried to to install is compatible. Further information on the issue I submitted & the help I received can be found in this thread here: https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=11073&p=23840#p23840
OS: All → Windows Vista
Hardware: All → x86
Type about:config into the address bar and look down the list for the extensions.strictCompatibility entry. What is its value?
HI Dave, Status: default Type: Boolean Value: False
Please enable extensions.logging.enabled in about:config, Open the error console and clear its contents then try to install the extension. Copy and paste any messages that appear in the error console after doing that.
If you disable all your other add-ons does it work then?
No, it doesnt work in Safe Mode either.
Blair, do you have any ideas here? I can't think of anything that would cause this to happen
Hmm, one possibility is that something is interfering with the update check. That update check needs to succeed for it to be compatible. Are you running any security software, a firewall, or are you on a corporate network? Could you click the following link: https://versioncheck.addons.mozilla.org/update/VersionCheck.php?reqVersion=2&id=en-GB@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org&version=1.19.1&maxAppVersion=4.0b8pre&status=userEnabled,incompatible&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=14.0.1&appOS=WINNT&appABI=x86-msvc&locale=en-GB&currentAppVersion=14.0.1&updateType=49&compatMode=normal Save it to a file, and attach it to this bug? Technical explanation: install.rdf gives a maxVersion of 4.0b8, so its not compatible by default without the compat update from that update ping. There are a couple of places where we don't log an error when doing the ping - I assume we're hitting one of those (filed bug 787052 to fix that). So I'm wondering if its failing the certificate check.
Attached file VersionCheck.php
Comment on attachment 657026 [details] VersionCheck.php I'm currently running ESET Smart Security & Malwarebytes
Also, after you click that link, right click and select page info, go to the security section. In the top section who does it say it is verified by?
Hi Dave, It says it's verified by "ESET, spol. s r. o."
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #12) > Hi Dave, > > It says it's verified by "ESET, spol. s r. o." Ok this explains the problem. ESET is intercepting every single connection your computer makes to websites, even secure ones. Presumably it is doing some kind of scanning for malicious content but what it means is that Firefox no longer knows how secure the original content was or who verified the owner of the website. The source of add-on update information (the thing critical to allowing this add-on to install) is subject to more rigorous security checks than normal websites and so since Firefox doesn't recognise ESET as one of its trusted authorities it is ignoring the update information and so not allowing you to install the add-on.
I was thinking the same thing, however I disabled ESET & I'm still unable to install it. Would you have any work-around or solution to this please?
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #14) > I was thinking the same thing, however I disabled ESET & I'm still unable to > install it. Would you have any work-around or solution to this please? After you disabled it what did the "Verified by" line change to in the page info for that page?
Hi Dave, -I've completely removed ESET from my machane & I am now able to install the Dictionary - Verified by "GeoTrust, Inc." - Sorry to have wasted your time. Do you have any suggestions on how I can get round this with ESET or where I can go for help please? Any help would be greatly appeciated. Again sorry for wasting everybodys time. I'm sure why ESET is being over zealous with this particular Add-on. Regards
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #16) > Hi Dave, > > -I've completely removed ESET from my machane & I am now able to install the > Dictionary > > - Verified by "GeoTrust, Inc." > > - Sorry to have wasted your time. Do you have any suggestions on how I can > get round this with ESET or where I can go for help please? > > Any help would be greatly appeciated. Again sorry for wasting everybodys > time. I'm sure why ESET is being over zealous with this particular Add-on. > > Regards Maybe install a different firewall in its stead? I'm setting this to INVALID which in this case means "Not a Mozilla bug".
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
P.S. If there is a bug reporting system for ESET, maybe you could report the problem there.
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #16) > -I've completely removed ESET from my machane & I am now able to install the > Dictionary Great news - glad we figured that out. > Do you have any suggestions on how I can > get round this with ESET or where I can go for help please? I think this offers a solution: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/923516 > Again sorry for wasting everybodys time. You haven't wasted our time at all! It was important for us to figure out what was going wrong, and if we could fix it. In this case, it was ESET causing the issue - but it could have turned out to be something else such as a bug in our code. However now I'm wondering how common this issue is, and wondering if we can detect it and maybe warn people (filed bug 787874). > I'm sure why ESET is being over zealous with this particular Add-on. It won't be targeting specifically that add-on - the part that was failing was essentially an update check for the add-on. ESET will be doing this to all add-on update checks, so normal add-on updates wouldn't have worked either.
(In reply to Blair McBride (:Unfocused) from comment #19) > (In reply to Portmanteau from comment #16) > > I'm sure why ESET is being over zealous with this particular Add-on. > > It won't be targeting specifically that add-on - the part that was failing > was essentially an update check for the add-on. ESET will be doing this to > all add-on update checks, so normal add-on updates wouldn't have worked > either. Incidentally neither will Firefox update checks, which are even stricter about the certificate it expects to see from the update server.
Thanks for all of your help, it's greatly appreciated. One more question if I may. Was there ever a comprehensive resolution to the "Server Not Found" error?
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #21) > Thanks for all of your help, it's greatly appreciated. > One more question if I may. Was there ever a comprehensive resolution to the > "Server Not Found" error? I don't see that mentioned anywhere in this bug report, can you elaborate
Sorry, I didn't mention it in this thread. It's something else I've been experiencing & seems to be well documented from what I've found. I seem to get the error intermittently & doesn't seem to be replicated in I.E explorer.
Severity: normal → blocker
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Component: Add-ons Manager → Documentation
OS: Windows Vista → All
Product: Toolkit → Add-on SDK
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Version: 14 Branch → unspecified
(In reply to Portmanteau from comment #23) > Sorry, I didn't mention it in this thread. It's something else I've been > experiencing & seems to be well documented from what I've found. I seem to > get the error intermittently & doesn't seem to be replicated in I.E explorer. I've just commented above but I was asked to change some categories before the comment was submitted????
You want to head over to http://support.mozilla.com/ for that.
Severity: blocker → normal
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago12 years ago
Component: Documentation → Add-ons Manager
OS: All → Windows Vista
Product: Add-on SDK → Toolkit
Hardware: All → x86
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla14
(In reply to Blair McBride (:Unfocused) from comment #25) > You want to head over to http://support.mozilla.com/ for that. Ok thanks again
Severity: normal → blocker
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Component: Add-ons Manager → General
OS: Windows Vista → All
Product: Toolkit → Add-on SDK
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Target Milestone: mozilla14 → ---
Severity: blocker → normal
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago12 years ago
Component: General → Add-ons Manager
OS: All → Windows Vista
Product: Add-on SDK → Toolkit
Hardware: All → x86
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Version: unspecified → 14 Branch
Portmanteau, this particular bug is about a problem which is a bug, but not a bug in Mozilla, so this bug is INVALID for bugzilla.mozilla.org. You may want to report it on the ESET bug reporting system, if they have one, or, if you have a different problem, you may want to open a different bug. If you keep repeatedly REOPENing this bug for no reason that we can see, steps will be taken to revoke your Bugzilla account. See also http://support.mozilla.com/ or http://kb.mozillazine.org/ for help about how to use Firefox, and see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html about proper behaviour at bugzilla.mozilla.org.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: