Closed
Bug 790995
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
bootstrapper fails to install packages
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla18
People
(Reporter: mcote, Assigned: gps)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
6.90 KB,
patch
|
k0scist
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I have a Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit system. I can already build m-c on it, but I ran the bootstrap.py script anyway to see what it would say. It identified several packages to install in two passes, but it appears to have skipped the actual installation. Here's the output. Note that I didn't press any keys; it just aborted the installation automatically. ---- $ curl https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/default/python/mozboot/bin/bootstrap.py | python - % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 4188 100 4188 0 0 2824 0 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:-- 3446 [sudo] password for mcote: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libjson-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-base-perl libxml-sax-perl libxml-simple-perl 0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 658 kB of archives. After this operation, 2,038 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Abort. Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done autoconf2.13 is already the newest version. libcurl4-openssl-dev is already the newest version. libiw-dev is already the newest version. libnotify-dev is already the newest version. libxt-dev is already the newest version. yasm is already the newest version. mercurial is already the newest version. libasound2-dev is already the newest version. mesa-common-dev is already the newest version. The following extra packages will be installed: libossp-uuid16 The following NEW packages will be installed: libossp-uuid16 uuid 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 63.3 kB of archives. After this operation, 198 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Abort. Your system should be ready to build Firefox! If you have not already, obtain a copy of the source code by running: hg clone https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central Or, if you prefer Git: git clone git://github.com/mozilla/mozilla-central.git
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
I haven't tested this, but I'm optimistic it will work. If you want to test, apply this patch in mozilla-central and run: python python/mozbuild/bin/bootstrap.py
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
The patch didn't apply cleanly, but once I applied it manually (and figured out that you meant python/mozboot/bin/bootstrap.py :) it appeared to work. I didn't get prompted to install the first batch of packages above (libjson-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-base-perl libxml-sax-perl libxml-simple-perl) though, only libossp-uuid16 and uuid. Is that ok?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Côté ( :mcote ) from comment #2) > The patch didn't apply cleanly, but once I applied it manually (and figured > out that you meant python/mozboot/bin/bootstrap.py :) it appeared to work. I > didn't get prompted to install the first batch of packages above > (libjson-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl > libxml-sax-base-perl libxml-sax-perl libxml-simple-perl) though, only > libossp-uuid16 and uuid. Is that ok? If it didn't prompt for all packages, I'm guessing that those were already installed and it just ran the program and it had no output. In the future, we'll probably want to query the package manager for package presence before blindly performing an "apt-get install". This is territory for a follow-up bug.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
No, I definitely don't have those packages installed. As I say, it prompted me when I ran it originally, meaning I don't have them installed--otherwise it would have just said something like "X is already the newest version". Now it doesn't, but I haven't installed those packages. But maybe that has to do with other changes that landed in the meantime?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Doh. I commented out a line while testing locally. Uncomment line 17 from ubuntu.py and it should work.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
This applies cleanly on m-c
Attachment #660889 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #660889 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Attachment #661051 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 661051 [details] [diff] [review] Change how commands are executed, v2 + print('Executing as root:', ' '.join(command)) I generally use subprocess.list2cmdline for outputting. It would be nice to keep the packages as lists and not just function arguments but this is more than fine for now.
Attachment #661051 -
Flags: review?(jhammel) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/150886c947f0
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla18
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Cool, looks like it works!
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 661051 [details] [diff] [review] Change how commands are executed, v2 Review of attachment 661051 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: python/mozboot/mozboot/ubuntu.py @@ +13,5 @@ > self.version = version > self.dist_id = dist_id > > def install_system_packages(self): > + self.run_as_root(['apt-get', 'build-dep', 'firefox']) Hmm, I thought we weren't supposed to use build-dep anymore.
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Hello, I am facing the same issue. How was it solved?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•