Closed Bug 791769 Opened 7 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Update PSL for .ve

Categories

(Core :: Networking: Domain Lists, defect)

defect
Not set

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla33

People

(Reporter: gerv, Assigned: weppos)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

Paulo Ney de Souza writes:

Now the diff, with the problems of Paraguay and Venezuela.

Paulo Ney de Souza

 diff -u list_old list_new
--- list_old    2012-07-04 20:00:39.000000000 -0300
+++ list_new    2012-07-14 23:56:59.697460844 -0300
@@ -5359,7 +5359,13 @@
 belau.pw

 // py : http://www.nic.py/faq_a.html#faq_b
-*.py
+py
+net.py
+com.py
+gov.py
+org.py
+edu.py
+coop.py

 // qa : http://domains.qa/en/
 qa
@@ -6255,7 +6261,13 @@
 edu.vc

 // ve : http://registro.nic.ve/nicve/registro/index.html
-*.ve
+ve
+com.ve
+net.ve
+org.ve
+info.ve
+co.ve
+web.ve

 // vg : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.vg
 vg
I'm assuming that the links he gives will back up the changes. Simone: can you check?

Gerv
The diff for .PY confirms the patch I submitted in #779834.
However, my patch also includes .mil.py that is officially available.

About .VE, the link seems to include only these 2LD in the select, however I can see this page [1] also mentions gob.ve, mil.ve, edu.ve, tec.ve. I'm trying to find the complete list, assuming it exists somewhere.

[1] http://www.nic.ve/documentos
OK, let's switch this bug to just .ve.

Gerv
Assignee: nobody → weppos
Summary: Update PSL for .py and .ve → Update PSL for .ve
I contacted the .VE registrar, I'm waiting for a response.
(In reply to Simone Carletti from comment #4)
> I contacted the .VE registrar, I'm waiting for a response.

Hi,

The list of the 2LD are:

.com.ve
.co.ve
.org.ve
.info.ve
.web.ve
.net.ve
.edu.ve
.e12.ve
.mil.ve
.gov.ve
.ve like nic.ve (1LD)

You can see available for registry for through this url: registro.nic.ve

Regards
Attached patch Patch for .VE (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Created the patch according to the registry information.
Attachment #667865 - Flags: review?(gerv)
Comment on attachment 667865 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch for .VE

r=gerv.

Gerv
Attachment #667865 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
Unfortunately this caused xpcshell failures:
{
TEST-PASS | /Users/cltbld/talos-slave/test/build/xpcshell/tests/netwerk/test/unit/test_bug414122.js | [checkPublicSuffix : 62] gov.vc == gov.vc

TEST-PASS | /Users/cltbld/talos-slave/test/build/xpcshell/tests/netwerk/test/unit/test_bug414122.js | [checkPublicSuffix : 62] mil.vc == mil.vc

TEST-PASS | /Users/cltbld/talos-slave/test/build/xpcshell/tests/netwerk/test/unit/test_bug414122.js | [checkPublicSuffix : 62] edu.vc == edu.vc

TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | xpcshell/head.js | [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE) [nsIEffectiveTLDService.getPublicSuffixFromHost]"  nsresult: "0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE)"  location: "JS frame :: /Users/cltbld/talos-slave/test/build/xpcshell/tests/netwerk/test/unit/test_bug414122.js :: checkPublicSuffix :: line 61"  data: no]
WARNING: nsExceptionService ignoring thread destruction after shutdown: file ../../../xpcom/base/nsExceptionService.cpp, line 166
WARNING: OOPDeinit() without successful OOPInit(): file ../../../toolkit/crashreporter/nsExceptionHandler.cpp, line 2252
}
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&rev=953079e94edd

Backout:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/ca480aedae9d
Attached patch Patch v.2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Unfortunately, the patch was made with leading dots, which are invalid :-| Here is an updated patch.

Gerv
Attachment #667865 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Sorry guys, my fault.

@ Gervase

On the PSL site http://publicsuffix.org/list/ I read

> Each rule lists a public suffix, with the subdomain portions separated by dots (.) as usual. A leading dot is optional.

Should we remove the 

> A leading dot is optional.

portion?
I removed the "a leading dot is optional".

This wasn't closed but, searching the checkin log, it did get merged to central.

Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
This was merged in https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/12b5f4b2f299 as noted in comment 11, there was a typo in the commit summary, which pointed to bug 761769 instead.

Reopening since gob.ve is missing (we have gov.ve instead). Comment 5 may have been incomplete, as comment 2 already listed gob.ve

The document [1] lists at «Disposiciones Específicas» (page 2) the tlds «gob.ve, mil.ve,edu.ve, tec.ve» (we miss gob.ve and tec.ve)
The «Disposiciones finales» point 3 states they are removing all registrations under gov.ve
However, there are still sites under it, such as http://www.tsj.gov.ve/

Sadly, I found no full tld list at https://registro.nic.ve/ and many old links are broken now. 
In addition to those above, wikipedia also lists arts.ve, radio.ve and int.ve
Their whois output [3] confirms [4] the existance of arts.ve and int.ve (test with zamoralapelicula.arts.ve, iica.int.ve) but rejects radio.ve (it's a normal registration)

Whois output also suggests rec.ve, store.ve and firm.ve can be used for registration (cisco.rec.ve, cisco.store.ve, cisco.firm.ve).



In summary: Add gob.ve, tec.ve, arts.ve, int.ve, rec.ve, store.ve, firm.ve to the PSL



1- http://conatel.gob.ve/files/marco_legal/normativa_tecnica.pdf (also attached) 
2- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ve
3- https://registro.nic.ve/modules/whois
4- There isn't any registrant information for the tld, but there is for the subdomain 
5- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.ve&diff=556960126&oldid=539273941
Google dork: site:.ve -site:.com.ve -site:.gob.ve -site:.org.ve -site:.web.ve -site:.info.ve -site:.net.ve -site:.edu.ve -site:.int.ve -site:e12.ve -site:.gov.ve -site:co.ve -site:mil.ve -site:arts.ve -site:usb.ve -site:ucv.ve -site:tec.ve -site:ula.ve -site:store.ve -site:rec.ve -site:firm.ve -site:luz.ve -site:ivic.ve -site:gobiernoenlinea.ve -site:reacciun.ve -site:cida.ve -site:internet.ve -site:nic.ve -site:ipv6.ve
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Patch adding arts.ve, firm.ve, gob.ve, int.ve, rec.ve, store.ve and tec.ve per comment 14.
Attachment #668418 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8425683 - Flags: review?(gerv)
Attachment #8425683 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2e73e55c42b7
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla33
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.