Created attachment 664190 [details] [diff] [review] patch
Comment on attachment 664190 [details] [diff] [review] patch [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): me not thinking we'd need symbols when I wrote this configure goop User impact if declined: no user impact, but developers will continue to have useless stacks in crash-stats Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): on trunk for a week, useful stacks have let us fix several bugs Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): no risks I can identify String or UUID changes made by this patch: none
Leaving this approval nom, we can make sure it lands post-merge on Oct 8th and gets into the first 17.0 beta
Lukas, I was suggesting that we get this into 16 and 17.
Comment on attachment 664190 [details] [diff] [review] patch Beta is representative enough that we should be able to make bugs actionable there (17), and we've already gone to build on 16 so it's unfortunately too late - fortunately this isn't too critical.
Setting tracking for 16, if there was a chemspill we would consider this for a ride-along.
Flagging as [qa-] since I don't believe this to be something QA needs to verify.