Closed
Bug 806669
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Add support for B2G Unagi jobs
Categories
(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nthomas, Assigned: nthomas)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
3.40 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
[philor: deploy peril-sensitive sunglasses now! we can't upload these builds anywhere public at the moment]
Unagi is the codename for the B2G dogfooding devices, and RelEng is starting to set up builds so we can transition over from the ateam infra. We're going to have dep builds starting real soon now, and nightlies coming along within a few days, with buildernames like this
b2g_mozilla-central_unagi_dep
b2g_mozilla-central_unagi_nightly
only over the whole gamut of branches that panda is current running for dep. We're not expecting to run any tests against these builds.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
If I'm reading the tbpl code correctly this patch will add a 'B2G Unagi' row per push, and use Bu & Nu for dep & nightly builds. Is that in keeping with the rest of the style for naming & organisation ?
Attachment #676445 -
Flags: review?(bmo)
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Patch looks good - quick question first about the Unagi builds:
I'm presuming they are full device images (similar to the concept of the panda images)?
If so, then I think it may be worth having a unified "Bi" (or whatever symbol) / "B2G Device Image {Build,Nightly}", rather than having separate entries for panda and unagi - given that we don't use "Bw", "Bo" for builds on windows and linux, since that's already specified by the OS column.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(nthomas)
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 676445 [details] [diff] [review]
Add unagi support
Canceling pending reply to comment 2.
Attachment #676445 -
Flags: review?(bmo)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ed Morley [:edmorley UTC+0] from comment #2)
> I'm presuming they are full device images (similar to the concept of the
> panda images)?
Yes, that's true. Patch to use Bi/Ni for panda and unagi coming up.
Flags: needinfo?(nthomas)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Is this what you had in mind ?
Attachment #676445 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #677278 -
Flags: review?(bmo)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: Add support for B2g Unagi jobs → Add support for B2G Unagi jobs
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 677278 [details] [diff] [review]
Add unagi support, v2
Yeah that was exactly what I was thinking of, thank you :-)
I just made a small tweak to make the (panda|unagi) non-capturing, to match the other uses of it, and landed as:
https://hg.mozilla.org/users/mstange_themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/rev/6667a45fe38f
I'll request a push to production today (might take a few days for it to be actioned).
Attachment #677278 -
Flags: review?(bmo) → review+
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
In production.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
Updated•10 years ago
|
Version: other → unspecified
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•