Closed
Bug 807210
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
JavaScript strict warning: chrome://pageloader/content/pageloader.js, line 275: assignment to undeclared variable gPaintHandler
Categories
(Testing :: Talos, defect)
Testing
Talos
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Yoric, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
3.87 KB,
patch
|
jmaher
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Message encountered when running talos test tdhtmlr
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Presuming this isn't platform specific
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
ABICT, gPaintHandler isn't used at all.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Is this supposed to be gPaintListener?
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
This just removes the thing and changes the license block. If it in fact should be gPaintListener then this patch is wrong ;)
Attachment #681270 -
Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 681270 [details] [diff] [review]
just remove it
Review of attachment 681270 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I am concerned about this, the intention was to mark gPaintHandler as false so that we can change a global state. We need to know if a page is loaded and if mozAfterPaint is true, then we have to wait for gPaintHandler to be set to True. Where is that set now?
Attachment #681270 -
Flags: review?(jmaher) → review-
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Current gPaintHandler appears only in the two places set in the patch. Should these be gPaintListener instead? That is defined at module scope and used several other places in the file.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
ahh, we need to change s/gPaintHandler/gPaintListener/, then things should work as expected.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #681540 -
Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 681540 [details] [diff] [review]
gPaintHandler -> gPaintListener
Review of attachment 681540 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
awesome.
Attachment #681540 -
Flags: review?(jmaher) → review+
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
What sort of testing should i do before I push?
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
I would run all tests on a single platform.
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
pushed to try: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=eff502e45f8d
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Try run for eff502e45f8d is complete.
Detailed breakdown of the results available here:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=eff502e45f8d
Results (out of 7 total builds):
success: 7
Builds (or logs if builds failed) available at:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/try-builds/jhammel@mozilla.com-eff502e45f8d
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #681270 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•