Closed
Bug 807338
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Memory increase discovered by mozmill endurance tests - Mac 10.7&10.8 since Oct25
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Tracking
(firefox18 unaffected, firefox19 affected)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox18 | --- | unaffected |
firefox19 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: mihaelav, Assigned: mihaelav)
Details
(Whiteboard: [MemShrink])
Memory consumption increased since Oct 25th for Nightly builds on Mac 10.7 and 10.8. Mac 10.7: Explicit memory (MB): Maximum: 218 / Average: 102 -> Maximum: 409 / Average: 120 Resident memory (MB): Maximum: 663 / Average: 203 -> Maximum: 852 / Average: 226 Mac 10.8: Explicit memory (MB): Maximum: 368 / Average: 117 -> Maximum: 460 / Average: 128 Resident memory (MB): Maximum: 791 / Average: 221 -> Maximum: 912 / Average: 234 Reports: * 24 Oct: - http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/2e7486a8c08b5541b9074117e0c81148 - http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/2e7486a8c08b5541b9074117e0c7f2e6 * 25 Oct: - http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/2e7486a8c08b5541b9074117e0f01342 http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/2e7486a8c08b5541b9074117e0eff3ec I was able to reproduce it locally on Mac 10.7: Explicit memory (MB): Maximum: 393 / Average: 129 -> Maximum: 458 / Average: 137 Resident memory (MB): Maximum: 615 / Average: 218 -> Maximum: 676 / Average: 230 Reports: * 24 Oct: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/190d57cf64e3c5c3996c0c1059435b2b * 25 Oct: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/190d57cf64e3c5c3996c0c10594552d1 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=93cc1ee94291&tochange=5c82f5a5e90d
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
That's a massive jump if it takes twice that much memory now. So please use tinderbox builds to nail down this problem ASAP. I will put this as a P1 item for the upcoming week.
Severity: normal → major
status-firefox18:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox19:
--- → affected
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [MemShrink] s=121105 u=failure c=endurance p=1
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This doesn't show up on the endurance tests for any other platforms? Nothing in the range jumps out at me as being something that might cause memory problems.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Henrik: The increase is not twice as much, I suspect you are comparing explicit to resident. The important numbers here are the average values: Mac 10.7: Average explicit memory (MB): 102 -> 120 Average resident memory (MB): 203 -> 226 Mac 10.8: Average explicit memory (MB): 117 -> 128 Average resident memory (MB): 221 -> 234 It also appears that the increase is large due to the testOpenAndCloseMultipleWindows test, which we're already aware is not giving realistic results. This will be addressed by bug 788531. Mihaela: Can you try to replicate this with a delay of 5 seconds?
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Pulling off from our automation sprint given that Mihaela is investigating this issue.
Assignee: nobody → mihaela.velimiroviciu
Priority: P1 → --
Whiteboard: [MemShrink] s=121105 u=failure c=endurance p=1 → [MemShrink]
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dave Hunt (:davehunt) from comment #3) > Mihaela: Can you try to replicate this with a delay of 5 seconds? I used a delay of 5 seconds when running the tests and it seems that now there is no difference in the used memory between Oct 24th and 25th Nightlies. Reports: * Oct 24: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/190d57cf64e3c5c3996c0c10599e0bda Explicit memory (MB): Minimum: 65 / Maximum: 166 / Average: 87 Resident memory (MB): Minimum: 121 / Maximum: 294 / Average: 161 * Oct 25: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/190d57cf64e3c5c3996c0c10599fdfdf Explicit memory (MB): Minimum: 65 / Maximum: 167 / Average: 87 Resident memory (MB): Minimum: 121 / Maximum: 294 / Average: 161
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mihaela Velimiroviciu [QA] (:mihaela) from comment #5) > I used a delay of 5 seconds when running the tests and it seems that now > there is no difference in the used memory between Oct 24th and 25th > Nightlies. That's great, thanks Mihaela!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•