Closed
Bug 808628
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[calendar] [UX] move through weeks and days (swiping right-left) should have horizontal transitions
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Calendar, defect, P4)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 797702
People
(Reporter: pabloUX, Assigned: kgrandon)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ], PRODUCT-ANNOYING )
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
currently is possible to move through weeks and days swiping left-right the screen, but there is no transitions that facilitates noticing and understating it.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Severity: major → normal
Priority: -- → P2
Whiteboard: Interaction design
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Agreed.
Priority: P2 → --
Whiteboard: Interaction design → interaction, UX-P2
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P2 → interaction, UX-P1
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Michal, didn't you work on calendar month panning a while ago?
Flags: needinfo?(mbudzynski)
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
I did, it's waiting for review for 2 months now (#797702)
Flags: needinfo?(mbudzynski)
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
The current version of that patch has some issues (the original issue was around .currentFrame which is still an issue) and we where seeing somewhere around 4-10 fps during transitions. Contacts had an interesting technique involving moz-element css rules (then transitioning those mirrors) to achieve better fps.
Personally I would prefer no transitions unless we can achieve a decent frame rate during transition.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
James, I'm worried about the lack of affordance created by not showing _any_ transition. Can you ballpark the feasibility of using the Contacts method?
Michal, can we improve the performance of your implementation?
Casey, can you comment on the usability here?
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1 → interaction, UX-P2
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Using a similar method would be fairly simple (LOE:S) but would definitely require some CSS/JS coordination. You might want to nom this for a P4 soft blocker or a P3 for c3?
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Okay, thanks James. Knowing that I will leave this in our UX-P2 queue for now, and make a P4, as you suggest.
Priority: -- → P4
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
[TEF_REQ] as Feature required for TEF build.
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P2 → interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ] → interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ], PRODUCT-ANNOYING
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → kgrandon
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Attachment #730209 -
Flags: review?(jlal)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #730209 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #730209 -
Flags: review?(jlal)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•