Closed
Bug 815402
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
'Remanence' is not in the US English dictionary
Categories
(Core :: Spelling checker, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla20
People
(Reporter: BenWa, Assigned: srinath)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [mentor=ehsan])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
41.70 KB,
patch
|
ehsan.akhgari
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Can you mentor this ehsan and make sure it's a valid addition :)
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
See <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Adding_a_new_word_to_the_en-US_dictionary> for how to fix this bug.
Whiteboard: [mentor=ehsan]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Hello Ehsan, I'm interested in picking this up. Can you assign this to me?
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → irtmail-bugzilla
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Thanks for your patch! I think Remanence is an uncountable noun, but CCing a native English speaker to verify. :-)
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
I believe that to be true, given the Wikipedia page on the concept. I've never seen the word myself :)
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> I believe that to be true, given the Wikipedia page on the concept. I've never
> seen the word myself :)
OK, thanks! Srinath, can you please post another version of the patch which does not include the plural form? Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #686428 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 686929 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixed: Added words Remanence, remanent to en-US dict [removed the plural form]
Looks great, thanks!
Attachment #686929 -
Flags: review+
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
The Wikipedia article <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remanence> uses the plural form "remanences", the Wiktionary page <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/remanence> says the plural form is "remanences", and one finds uses of the word in technical literature <http://magician.ucsd.edu/essentials/WebBookse87.html>, so it looks like a countable noun.
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Thanks, Myk! Pushed a follow-up to add the plural form:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/534c895a396a
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ce1e1e13511b
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/534c895a396a
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla20
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•