Closed Bug 820177 Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago

sound heard on bluetooth headset even when volume set to 0

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(blocking-b2g:-, blocking-basecamp:-, b2g18+ fixed, b2g18-v1.0.0 wontfix, b2g18-v1.0.1 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
1.1 QE1 (5may)
blocking-b2g -
blocking-basecamp -
Tracking Status
b2g18 + fixed
b2g18-v1.0.0 --- wontfix
b2g18-v1.0.1 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: ggrisco, Assigned: alive)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: testrun 5.1, [TD-8992], [TD-9353])

Attachments

(1 file)

No description provided.
1. Switch ON BT from Settings>Bluetooth. 2. Pair to a Headset 3. Make a MT call, receive from headset 4. Set volume to 0 from headset We can see that,even though the volume is 0, phone audio is still heard in the headset Note: ------- The same issue is seen even when volume is set to 0 from phone.
I'm not sure if this has anything to do with bluetooth. When I turn off BT and make MT call and set the volume to 0, I still hear in-call audio on phone speaker.
Hi, could you try this same case with other commercial phone? As I know that the volume 0 on in_call state doesn't really mute the remote audio, because what we want on in_call state is to hear the sound from remote. Thanks.
I believe the best way to resolve this bug is to remove the mute icon when on a call. It's reasonable that voice is not mutable, you can only adjust it to a small value.
Assignee: nobody → alive
Every other phone I'm aware of has voice mute.
My Galaxy S3 cannot use the volume rocker to reach 0 when on a call. Seems like another solution to the UI. (In reply to Kyle Machulis [:kmachulis] [:qdot] from comment #5) > Every other phone I'm aware of has voice mute.
Misunderstood the bug. Android doesn't have voice mute features either. Ignore me. :)
This seems like enough of an edge case that it shouldn't block. If anyone disagrees, as usual, please re-nom with some reasoning.
blocking-basecamp: ? → -
Looks like the root complaint is merely that the volume should stop at 1 and not go to 0. Purely a cosmetic app issue. It's not about the mute button as that doesn't affect the other party's volume.
Build ID: 20130130070201 Kernel: Dec 5 Gecko http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/4593f3e765eb Gaia f7f5a0cd17e3d04308cc5850b254947e127122b9 Testrun 4 Failed Testcase https://moztrap.mozilla.org/runtests/run/712/env/296/?pagenumber=1&pagesize=100&sortfield=order&sortdirection=asc&filter-id=5809&filter-suite=208 UCID user-sound-028 When making a call, lowering the volume is misleading because it appears visually to be muted when it's not muted in actuality.
Whiteboard: testrun 4
when making a call, lowering the volume all the way down shows the mute icon but the sounds are still audible Unagi Build ID: 20130225070200 Environmental Variables: Kernel Date: Dec 5 Gecko: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18_v1_0_1/rev/3a5a27992a75 Gaia: 5691a16fff8e1403c75ed9d6f3a443b7e58198c6 Notes: Test Suite Name: User sound UCID: User sound-028 Link to the failed test case: https://moztrap.mozilla.org/runtests/run/859/env/305/?pagenumber=1&pagesize=20&sortfield=order&sortdirection=asc&filter-id=5809&filter-suite=208 Q Analysts Test Team Priority Rating: Pri 3
Whiteboard: testrun 4 → testrun 5.1
Sounds like the testcase might be invalid. Need requirements check.
Keywords: qawanted
Assuming the STR in comment 13 are accurate, tef+. We can't be displaying the mute icon while the other end can still hear.
blocking-b2g: --- → tef+
Patch proposal: 1. Hide mute button under telephony and bt_sco channel 2. Add one more segment to telephony and bt_sco channel
Attachment #723354 - Flags: review?(timdream)
Attachment #723354 - Flags: review?(timdream) → review+
Should this be marked as FIXED?
I think comment 13 vs. comment 15 might be talking about two different things. Michael tef+'d based on mute not muting (i.e. microphone), but I think we're really talking about "silent mode" not being silent on bluetooth--that is, shows speaker off, but there's really slight sound coming through. Further, the testcase actually refers to the ringer volume not the call volume. I don't think the microphone was involved here at all, and I'm pretty confused as to what functionality we think is fixed, tef+'d, etc.
Why is this really a blocker even if it is a bug? Worst case the user can remove or turn off the headset. Trivial user workaround.
I think it was marked blocker under the assumption the microphone showed muted when not muted. That would be a big privacy concern. But I don't think that's the bug.
Fixed but haven't be merged to v1-train or v1.0.1 yet. The problem here is voice (and bt sco) really doesn't have mute state so I remove the mute icon and increase one more segment on UI -- to indicate voice volume doesn't go to 0 anyway. But BT(a2dp) -- which isn't implemented in v1 -- should be muted normally. It's up to drivers to determine if this is a blocker. I am marking fixed first.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to Geo Mealer [:geo] from comment #21) > I think it was marked blocker under the assumption the microphone showed > muted when not muted. That would be a big privacy concern. But I don't think > that's the bug. Yep, that's what I got out of it earlier. But if this is not the case then yes I agree, not a blocker.
blocking-b2g: tef+ → -
Removing QA Wanted. It's a valid test case: 1. Enter the dialer, enter a number and make a call. V1 : you can hear the ringer sound while calling. 2. While the ringer is heard try to change the volume. V2 : You are able to set the volume.
Keywords: qawanted
blocking-b2g: - → leo?
Not a blocker, but Alive - can you nominate for uplift if this is low risk?
blocking-b2g: leo? → -
Flags: needinfo?(alive)
tracking-b2g18: --- → +
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #25) > Not a blocker, but Alive - can you nominate for uplift if this is low risk? Sure, lemme try to understand the nominate process now..
Flags: needinfo?(alive)
Comment on attachment 723354 [details] https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/8564 NOTE: Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing to better understand the B2G approval process and landings. [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): User impact if declined: Testing completed: Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): String or UUID changes made by this patch: Low risk because most of the fix is on CSS part. (I cannot find approval-gaia-v1...)
Attachment #723354 - Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18?
blocking-b2g: - → leo?
Please uplift to V1-train, I set leo? gain
blocking-b2g: leo? → -
Comment on attachment 723354 [details] https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/8564 the approval-gaia-v1 flag is missing because of the product/component this is in - so approving for uplift to v1-train with the approval-mozilla-b2g18 flag. leo: This does not need to be leo+ to get uplifted, it's not a blocker, it's tracked, and we have a low risk fix to uplift.
Attachment #723354 - Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18? → approval-mozilla-b2g18+
Whiteboard: testrun 5.1 → testrun 5.1 [TD-8992]
Whiteboard: testrun 5.1 [TD-8992] → testrun 5.1 [TD-8992] [TD-9353]
Whiteboard: testrun 5.1 [TD-8992] [TD-9353] → testrun 5.1, [TD-8992], [TD-9353]
John, can you assist with the uplift please? :)
Flags: needinfo?(jhford)
James, maybe you can? :)
Flags: needinfo?(jlal)
in v1-train: c805382f646092ce133638e41bb265ee791bee7e in v1.0.1: 9e7062731f6e06fda5c144c35459bf5fb3cfecd2
Flags: needinfo?(jlal)
Flags: needinfo?(jhford)
Target Milestone: --- → Leo QE1 (5may)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: