Closed Bug 820388 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

update tbpl for panda_gaia_central builds

Categories

(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: bhearsum, Assigned: emorley)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Eg, b2g_mozilla-beta_panda_gaia_central_dep
Desired symbol? :-) (See bug 818464 comment 4 for what we did for beta)
Assignee: nobody → edmorley.bz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Since these are expected to have at least some tests (IIRC), let's use a different row for them. Let's say "B2G Panda gaia-central opt" for the row, and stick with "Bi" for the cell.
Agreed if we're going to run tests after all, then new row best. "B2G Panda gaia-central opt" is a bit wide, and would mean losing more horizontal space for the results. The widest currently is: "Android 2.2 Armv6 opt" How about: "B2G Panda gaia-tip opt" (Or anything else of that length or less).
(In reply to Ed Morley [UTC+0; email:edmorley@moco] from comment #3) > Agreed if we're going to run tests after all, then new row best. > > "B2G Panda gaia-central opt" is a bit wide, and would mean losing more > horizontal space for the results. > > The widest currently is: > "Android 2.2 Armv6 opt" > > How about: > "B2G Panda gaia-tip opt" "tip" is an ambiguous term. How about "B2G Panda g-central opt"?
Attached image Screenshot —
Using "B2G Panda g-central" is still a bit wide :-( Given that (a) if devs don't know about the gaia workflow, "gaia-central" (with no further explanation) is still not going to make complete sense, and (b) once they know, it's redundant information shown on every single push; could we perhaps just abbreviate to "g-c" or something? (also, we don't use "No-ionmonkey", and happy to abbreviate there).
Attached patch Patch v1 — — Splinter Review
Using "g-c", let me know what you think :-)
Attachment #691771 - Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment on attachment 691771 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Review of attachment 691771 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Good enough for me.
Attachment #691771 - Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Depends on: 821491
In production :-)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: