User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/537.21 Steps to reproduce: I'm using FF 17.0.1 (Release channel) http://philbit.com/SvgImagePerformance/backgroundImage.html FF renders that at 0 fps. WebKit does about 4 fps, but pdr@ is about to fix us to do 60fps. WARNING: That link will hang FF so hard you can't interact with it. http://philbit.com/SvgImagePerformance/ has some other perf tests from pdr.
I misspoke, WebKit does 53fps on the backgroundImage.html test, but does poorly on others in that directory.
SPS Profile against Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20130308 Firefox/22.0 ID:20130308031005 CSet: cb432984d5ce: http://people.mozilla.com/~bgirard/cleopatra/#report=34b661e1775b74e2ce1a4a41fbe7fc7c8fae09bc
Working range: bad=2013-06-14 good=2013-06-15 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=b197bed90a98&tochange=3d16d59c9317 Any idea about the bug which fixed that? Bug 678037?
Windows 7 - Nightly 27.0a1 (2013-10-23) I'm getting 20fps only. On Firefox 25 Beta 11 I'm getting 60fps.
(In reply to Guilherme Lima from comment #9) > Windows 7 - Nightly 27.0a1 (2013-10-23) I'm getting 20fps only. > On Firefox 25 Beta 11 I'm getting 60fps. Yep, I can confirm that Attachment 692358 [details] regressed on Trunk/Nightly (cset 5d5591687e67); still WFM against Aurora.
STR Open http://philbit.com/SvgImagePerformance/backgroundImage.html Regression window(m-i) Good 53fps: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/9c8ab7e9ae41 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 ID:20131017025216 Bad 15fps: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/45d9e6cd3473 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 ID:20131017030414 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=9c8ab7e9ae41&tochange=45d9e6cd3473 regressed by: a417424f9213 Robert O'Callahan — Bug 923193. Make transform-origin on SVG elements use the SVG bbox as the reference rectangle. r=heycam
Needinfo on Roc here to help understand if this would have any user facing impact ?
Fixed by 929021?
I can still see the performance regression in http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2f2a45f04e7c Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 ID:20131025100746 Small improved by Bug 929021. Before landing Bug 923193, 53fps After landing Bug 923193, 15fps After landing Bug 929021, 22fps
(In reply to Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) from comment #13) > Fixed by 929021? :roc, is comment #14 satisfactory with the expectation ?
NI on :roc to see if any new landings have fixed this and also help shed light on if this is an important perf regression to track from a blocker perpective.
Should have been fixed via this backout: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3fb151446ec5 If there is any other regression it's probably bug 922942.
Fixed by bug 600207.