Closed
Bug 823306
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
update http://puppetagain.pub.build.mozilla.org/data/python/packages/ for todays talos
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: k0scist, Assigned: mozilla)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
1010 bytes,
patch
|
k0scist
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
361 bytes,
patch
|
jmaher
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The package index for talos + deps should be updated for modern talos. We need the following new versions: * mozdevice-0.15 : http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/m/mozdevice/mozdevice-0.15.tar.gz#md5=70e8b39c80fad088b081b3cc50c838f8 (We could bump talos to 0.18, the latest version, if we wanted) * mozhttpd-0.5 : http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/m/mozhttpd/mozhttpd-0.5.tar.gz#md5=04c8ec430d4e0f2294179b4a28a5af14 * datazilla-1.2 : http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/datazilla/datazilla-1.2.tar.gz#md5=ae8daee92af8a66dca82693c7b987089 In addition, we need a new version of talos. Currently, this is keyed off of hg tag, so we could use http://hg.mozilla.org/build/talos/archive/71f7f2ed08a7.tar.gz (albeit we want to fix the datazilla package dep in talos, bug 823260, so the revision will be different. Or we could finally bump talos to 0.1. I have no strong opinions at this juncture, but my gut feeling is that bumping to 0.1 is probably better.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Jeff: Is it correct to assume that this shouldn't proceed until bug 823260 is resolved?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #1) > Jeff: Is it correct to assume that this shouldn't proceed until bug 823260 > is resolved? There's no reason not to update the dependencies (although there's no strong reason to do so either). But yes, we should wait on bug 823260 for the talos package (and also figure out if we want to name it after the version or....)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Where are we on this? Bug 823260 is resolved; are we going to update the version, or should I push the current revision? If we take default, do we need to add mozcrash as well?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
The short answer is: I don't know. Since I have no power to push talos packages, it mostly doesn't matter to me. What I think should happen is a version bump of talos every time we deploy to m-c. But I've suggested that before and it hasn't happened, nor are the versions up there versioned this way. The new talos will need mozcrash when it is deployed. I don't really have any great ideas on how to get people on the same page here. I'm open to suggestions
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → aki
Flags: needinfo?(jhammel)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Ok, I currently have datazilla-1.2.tar.gz mozhttpd-0.5.tar.gz mozcrash-0.2.1.tar.gz talos-766a17c47b0d.tar.gz mozdevice-0.15.tar.gz downloaded. I'm going to wait til we have Cedar reset and have a green talos run before uploading, so we catch any pre-talos-bump bustage. * IT resets cedar * we reland talos.json for mozharness talos * (hopefully nothing has to happen here) * talos goes green * upload the above 5 packages to puppetagain * make sure talos is still green * point talos.json to new talos tarball
Depends on: 825899
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #6) X IT resets cedar X we reland talos.json for mozharness talos X (hopefully nothing has to happen here) X talos goes green X upload the above 5 packages to puppetagain _ make sure talos is still green <--- we are here _ point talos.json to new talos tarball https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Cedar&rev=3f4b43ae2be2
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
X make sure talos is still green X point talos.json to new talos tarball http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/cedar/rev/01a70d37b5be https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Cedar&rev=01a70d37b5be Calling this fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Also had to upload mozlog 1.1
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Also had to remove sunspider from talos.json: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/cedar/rev/993e66df0419 Backed out due to continuing bustage: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/cedar/rev/e41c92fa3466
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
This won't fix the exception, but it'll stop highlighting the ignorable libyaml error.
Attachment #697733 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
17:04:34 INFO - tar: talos/breakpad/osx64: Cannot create symlink to `osx': No such file or directory 17:04:36 ERROR - tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors 17:04:36 ERROR - Return code: 2 17:04:36 FATAL - Halting on failure while running c:/mozilla-build/msys/bin/bash -c "PATH=/c/mozilla-build/msys/bin:$PATH tar zx --strip-components=1 -f '/c/talos-slave/test/build/talos-766a17c47b0d.tar.gz' --wildcards '**/talos/'" 17:04:36 FATAL - Exiting 2 The osx64 -> osx softlink is responsible for at least some of the breakage. I checked; there are 0 softlinks in the talos repo in revision 0e9224d7bc95.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
cd talos/breakpad hg rm osx64 hg cp osx osx64
Attachment #697739 -
Flags: review?(jhammel)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #697739 -
Flags: review?(jmaher)
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 697739 [details] [diff] [review] fix talos softlink Review of attachment 697739 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- lgtm
Attachment #697739 -
Flags: review?(jmaher) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 697739 [details] [diff] [review] fix talos softlink http://hg.mozilla.org/build/talos/rev/4a0e7514c66c I'm going to try using this revision on cedar now.
Attachment #697739 -
Flags: review?(jhammel) → checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
We seem to be using the new version of talos successfully. I'm going to keep this bug open 'til jhammel reviews https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=697733&action=edit .
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 697733 [details] [diff] [review] venv error -> warning lgtm
Attachment #697733 -
Flags: review?(jhammel) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 697733 [details] [diff] [review] venv error -> warning http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/7a7dafc08703
Attachment #697733 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•