82515 - not displaying CSS

Status: VERIFIED WONTFIX

(Core :: DOM: CSS Object Model, defect)

Description

[Iván L. Yivoff]

I tried putting the CSS both inline and in an external file, but nothing.

It worked on previous nightlies, and it works on IE. The strange thing, is that
other sites that use CSS work allright (e.g.: www.ddmsa.com, it works perfectly).

Comment 1

[Dan Naumov]

WFM on May 23 build 2001052304 under Win2000 (SP2).

Comment 2

[Alexey Chernyak]

reporter, what build are you using?
what exactly is not working?
please read: http://www.mozilla.org/quality/bug-writing-guidelines.html

In the above URL both <script> and <style> tags are missing type= attribute
which is required by HTML standard.

The inline style properties like for example "top:20; left:176; width: 445" have
some numbers specified, but what those numbers are?
These CSS properties accept length which should be specified in em, ex, px, in,
cm, mm, pt or pc. Numbers by themselve mean nothing (except for 0).
For reference see: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#value-def-length

Comment 3

[Jason Johnston]

WFM also, 2001052404 Win2K

Comment 4

[Johnny Stenback (:jst)]

The I assume the problem with this page is that the buttons at the top of the
page don't fade (gradually) when you mouse over the buttons. I haven't looked at
this in detail yet, but it looks like the page is using proprietary IE CSS
extensions that are not supported (or don't work the same way) in mozilla. Can
someone confirm?

Comment 5

[Jason Johnston]

Yes, thanks Johnny for finding the difference, I didn't notice it the first time
around.

The page uses style="filter:opacity(xx%)" which is an IE proprietary CSS
property.  The closest thing Moz has to this is the -moz-opacity property. Iván,
you should be advised that the filter property is not a part of the W3C CSS
Recommendation, and Mozilla doesn't and won't support it (unless it at some
point becomes a part of the Spec).

Of course, if that was not what you were talking about, let us know.  Otherwise
this bug will be marked Invalid.

Comment 6

[Johnny Stenback (:jst)]

WONTFIX

Comment 7

[Hixie (not reading bugmail)]

v