Closed Bug 82809 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

bugzilla puts &#013; inside <pre> tags

Categories

(Bugzilla :: User Interface, defect, P2)

2.11
x86
Linux

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 2.16

People

(Reporter: old-mozilla, Assigned: myk)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

I'm not sure if that's legal or not, but I do know that Konqueror can't cope 
with it as well as mozilla can. Now I know most folks around here don't care 
if another browser can handle the html we use or not, but when mozilla is 
falling apart and you're trying to report that fact in bugzilla, you need 
another browser to do it. Having line feeds encoded as html entities tends to 
make pre blocks an unholy mess, especially if they contain things like stack 
traces, or patches.
Bugzilla is a separate product from Mozilla, and we expect it to work on all
browsers as much as possible ... some of the team are involved very little or
not at all in Mozilla development.
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.16
*** Bug 84292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Priority: -- → P2
-> New Bugzilla Product
Assignee: tara → myk
Component: Bugzilla → User Interface
Product: Webtools → Bugzilla
Version: Bugzilla 2.11 → 2.11
Depends on: 97980
FYI, the "links" text-based browser also doesn't like this encoding.
The quoteUrls() routine, which all of the comments are passed through to add
hyperlinks before being displayed, calls value_quote() on the final comment
text, then does a s/&#010;/\n/g on the results before passing it back.  Problem
is, several months back, value_quote() was changed to use &#013; for line
endings instead of &#010; because some browsers (most notably Netscape Mac) had
problems with &#010; in hidden form values (which is the primary thing
value_quote() is used for).

The patch I just uploaded changes quoteUrls() to swap out &#013; instead of &#010;.
Keywords: patch, review
No longer depends on: 97980
Comment on attachment 51829 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch to quoteUrls()

[03:44:28] <timeless> r=timeless for your change :-)
[03:44:33] <timeless> no second review needed [imo]
Attachment #51829 - Flags: review+
checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: