Closed
Bug 834709
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
[Transitions. UX] Implement "invoke an app" transition as specified.
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: vicky, Assigned: crdlc)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [TEF_REQ], ux-tracking)
Attachments
(2 files)
Please refer to:
http://buildingfirefoxos.com/transitions.html#invoke
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ekzrrz7um4uj6y0/NVzqB1D4hx/03%20Transitions
TransitionsVXX.pdf (latest version)
Lack of Transitions affect the experience. Required for TEF build.
Transitions a key feature to give the user a clue of the architecture of the OS and how to navigate it.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1 → interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ] → interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ], PRODUCT-ANNOYING
Updated•12 years ago
|
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: interaction, UX-P1, [TEF_REQ], PRODUCT-ANNOYING → u=user c=system s=ux-most-wanted, [TEF_REQ]
Whiteboard: u=user c=system s=ux-most-wanted, [TEF_REQ] → u=user c=system s=ux-most-wanted [TEF_REQ]
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → crdlc
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
I have the current implementation here [1]:
[1] https://github.com/crdlc/gaia/tree/bug-aia
It is based on bug 804270
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
We are trying to install a new homescreen with a lot of logs in order to know what happens when it fails and reverts icons. Thanks
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
sorry, the last message was wrong. I should write in other bug :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
The last animation ;)
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: review?(21)
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: feedback?(vpg)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Looks great.
Thanks Cristian!
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: feedback?(vpg)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
please Vivien, do you need some help here to review the patch? tell me if you need something, thanks a lot
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cristian Rodriguez (a remontar!) from comment #7)
> please Vivien, do you need some help here to review the patch? tell me if
> you need something, thanks a lot
Sorry I'm taking forever because I have seen some cases where the homescreen is zoomed with the previous patch and I would like to fix it before landing more changes to the window manager.
See bug 866643
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Once this is reviewed, we can push this through triage according to Daniel's request.
Just keep me posted when its landed to master.
Thanks!
Jaime
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
When Vivien review the bug 866643, he said that he will start reviewing this one, thanks
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: u=user c=system s=ux-most-wanted [TEF_REQ] → [TEF_REQ], ux-tracking
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Hi Vivien, the bug 866643 was closed as worksforme due to your bug 866174 fixed the problem. I rebased this pull request with the master and then tell me when you can review it, thanks a lot!
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cristian Rodriguez de la Cruz (:crdlc) from comment #11)
> Hi Vivien, the bug 866643 was closed as worksforme due to your bug 866174
> fixed the problem. I rebased this pull request with the master and then tell
> me when you can review it, thanks a lot!
Sorry for the incredibly long delay to review this PR. I keep procrastinating about it and push it back into my list of stuff to do. I will try to review it at the beginning of next week. Thanks for being always patient and nice Cristian, really appreciated :)
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
OK, I know that you are busy, don't worry. Please tell me when you start reviewing it because I've resolved conflicts a few times here :) but maybe for that moment the branch couldn't be merged, thanks a lot my friend.
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 739114 [details]
Patch v1
The app-ready mechanism seems a way to bypass all the existing code inside the window manager. I don't really like it.
Also I wish some of the code paths can be unified.
r- for those 2 points.
I like that you remove 3 classes!
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: review?(21) → review-
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Also the new app that is opened is often not visible in the transition. Can we add at least a white background so something will be visible?
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 739114 [details]
Patch v1
I've implemented your suggestions, thanks for the feedback Vivien
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: review- → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 739114 [details]
Patch v1
Could Vivien r+ the patch just for the record? There were no r= on the comment of the patch too...
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: review+ → review?(21)
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 739114 [details]
Patch v1
Post mortem r+ i believe...
Attachment #739114 -
Flags: review?(21) → review+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•