Closed
Bug 8388
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
{compat} empty <P> elements used to space <li>s are ignored
Categories
(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: Crysgem, Assigned: buster)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: current behaviour is per spec)
Apprunner Build ID: 1999061608 The unordered list on the document's starboard should be centered, and it's items expansive within a single line... but, as if compressed within a cell or line-broken, it's text spills. A parser bug? A layout bug? There are minds greater than this one to determine.
The only problem I see is that the <UL> on the top/center of the screen is too closely aligned vertically. The nested <P> should be causing extra whitespace. Here's the min. test case: <html><body> <ul> <p><li>item1 <p><li>item2 <p><li>item3 </ul> </BODY></html>
The Apprunner created at 1999061708, rickg@netscape.com, validates your words... the Parser bugs I report ever seem to heal before you scan them. However, the GIF data heading the page should be aligned rightmost... aye, Herr Coder, a seperate bug.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Summary: Unordered list eviscerated → nested table alignment is broken
Er, I mean not to override you, respected checker, but the issue of the bug as perceived by rickg@netscape.com is *not* resolved. Yes?
Summary: nested table alignment is broken → UL elements not sufficiently spaced
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Summary: UL elements not sufficiently spaced → {compat} empty <P> elements used to space <li>s are ignored
Whiteboard: current behaviour is per spec
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I only noticed the GIF alignment bug, which is indeed a dup of 7112. The bug that Rick notes is actually not a bug. Empty <P> elements should be ignored according to the HTML4 spec, and Mozilla is doing exactly that. Hence now I'm marking this bug invalid. You are welcome to reopen it, of course, if you disagree or if there is another problem that I have missed!
I've not absorbed the specification, but, on the right of adherence to intent, I agree. (Assuming you are correct)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•