842376 - Update HTMLImageElement's named constructor to use optional arguments

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Description

[(no longer active)]

Attachment: Patch (v1)

See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20554

Comment 1

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

Where is the foundation of this change? Even the latest spec doesn't use optional arguments.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded-content-1.html#the-img-element
Please file a spec bug, at least.

Comment 2

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

Sorry, I missed the URL.

Comment 3

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

Hm, W3C HTML5 has even more discrepancy from WHATWG HTML?
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content-0.html#the-img-element
However the IDL refer the WHATWG's version, not W3C's one.

Comment 4

[(no longer active)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Hm, W3C HTML5 has even more discrepancy from WHATWG HTML?
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content-0.html#the-img-element
> However the IDL refer the WHATWG's version, not W3C's one.

Doesn't Hixie pull these types of changes in to the WHATWG spec too?

Comment 5

[:Ms2ger (he/him; ⌚ UTC+1/+2)]

Filed a bug on the spec we implement...

Comment 6

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Comment on attachment 715221 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch (v1)

r=me

Comment 7

[(no longer active)]

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/68359d79d869

Comment 8

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/68359d79d869