Closed Bug 846968 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

STK: Empty idle mode text does not remove the existing idle mode text

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Settings, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(blocking-b2g:-, b2g18+)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 846966
blocking-b2g -
Tracking Status
b2g18 + ---

People

(Reporter: cyang, Assigned: frsela)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

According to ETSI TS 102 223, section 6.6.22: "If the "Text string" is a null data object (i.e. length = '00' and no value part), the terminal shall remove the existing idle mode text in the terminal." Currently, the empty idle mode text appears below the previous idle mode text in the notification area instead of clearing the previous text. Please see screenshot attached. If there were no previous idle mode texts, and an empty idle mode text comes, visually nothing should happen. If there were previous idle mode texts, and an empty idle mode text comes, then the previous text should be removed from the notification area. PDU used to test: D00B8103012800820281828D00 JSON sent: RILContentHelper: Received message 'RIL:StkCommand': {"commandNumber":1,"typeOfCommand":40,"commandQualifier":0,"options":{"text":""}} Let me know if a different JSON message should be sent to indicate empty idle mode text.
blocking-b2g: tef? → tef+
Assignee: nobody → frsela
AFAIK, In the current Notification Bar API we cann't remove previous notifications nor create group of notifications.
Fernando, is this something that can be added for v1.0.1 if not already present, otherwise we will have to mark the GCF TCs as NA?
(In reply to Anshul from comment #2) > Fernando, is this something that can be added for v1.0.1 if not already > present, otherwise we will have to mark the GCF TCs as NA? Regarding v1.0.1 depends on the roadmap to finish notifications (bug 782211) Meanwhile, I agree as mart it as NA
Fernando, do you known an ETA on bug 782211. Seems like the patches are available and may be land in few days. If you think otherwise, please mark this bug as won't fix.
This would require changing the notification API, which IMHO is not something we should be doing for 1.0.1 at this stage of the game.
Lucas, is it doable in the Leo time frame? We will mark this GCF TC as NA.
blocking-b2g: tef+ → leo?
Tracking this pending landing of the dependent bug.
blocking-b2g: leo? → -
tracking-b2g18: --- → +
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: