Closed
Bug 847636
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Intermittent test_focus_browserui.xul | Assertion count 1 is greater than expected range (Can't create an accessible for the document!: 'parentDocAcc')
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: tbsaunde)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, intermittent-failure)
Attachments
(2 files)
70.55 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
4.12 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=20310372&tree=Mozilla-Inbound&full=1 builder: mozilla-inbound_xp-debug_test-mochitest-other slave: talos-r3-xp-056 13:32:53 INFO - 2976 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | wrong state bits for ['input node', address: [object HTMLInputElement], role: entry, name: 'Search or enter address', address: 0xa90b800]! 13:32:53 INFO - 2977 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Focussed ['input node', address: [object HTMLInputElement], role: entry, name: 'Search or enter address', address: 0xa90b800] must be focusable! 13:32:53 INFO - 2978 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Singleline ['input node', address: [object HTMLInputElement], role: entry, name: 'Search or enter address', address: 0xa90b800] cannot be multiline! 13:32:53 INFO - ++DOMWINDOW == 45 (0D077BE8) [serial = 202] [outer = 0CD65858] 13:32:53 INFO - 2979 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Test with ID = '[ 'document node', address: 0xc8d18d8 ] 't ctrl ' key' succeed. Event focus was handled. 13:32:53 INFO - 2980 INFO TEST-INFO | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Invoke the '[ 'document node', address: 0xc8d18d8 ] 'w ctrl ' key' test { scenario #0: expected 'focus' event; } 13:32:54 INFO - 2981 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | wrong state bits for ['input@id="input" node', address: 0xc185358, role: entry, address: 0xa484c00]! 13:32:54 INFO - 2982 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Focussed ['input@id="input" node', address: 0xc185358, role: entry, address: 0xa484c00] must be focusable! 13:32:54 INFO - 2983 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Singleline ['input@id="input" node', address: 0xc185358, role: entry, address: 0xa484c00] cannot be multiline! 13:32:54 INFO - 2984 INFO TEST-PASS | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Test with ID = '[ 'document node', address: 0xc8d18d8 ] 'w ctrl ' key' succeed. Event focus was handled. 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: getting z level of unregistered window: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/xpfe/appshell/src/nsWindowMediator.cpp, line 558 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: getting z level of unregistered window: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/xpfe/appshell/src/nsWindowMediator.cpp, line 558 13:32:54 INFO - ###!!! ASSERTION: Can't create an accessible for the document!: 'parentDocAcc', file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/accessible/src/base/DocManager.cpp, line 373 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000011C1F4B 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000011C5494 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000008E8317 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000008E94BB 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000008F1BAC 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000E8DF25 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000E80F15 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000F0EB03 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000F14A9B 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000F03D08 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000919D1D 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000091C8CE 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000091FD1F 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000091FC10 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000001833D70 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000DE4754 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000DE8A1E 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001ACF56 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001AD518 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x000000000024FAEF 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000003478A9 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x0000000000254B74 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x000000000025671B 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001ACDF9 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001C4629 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001A0771 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001AD02D 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x00000000001AD518 13:32:54 INFO - mozjs!JS_GetStringCharsZ+0x0000000000043058 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000DD60B2 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000DCB0B0 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000001833F79 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000183407A 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000001812D62 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000017B8E8F 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000012BEB75 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000185A495 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000185AB10 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000185B114 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000117F962 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000011380C8 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000F2603A 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x000000000001FE09 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x00000000000201F0 13:32:54 INFO - xul!JSD_GetScriptTotalExecutionTime+0x0000000000020738 13:32:54 INFO - 0x000000000040249A 13:32:54 INFO - 0x0000000000402BDE 13:32:54 INFO - 0x0000000000402D2F 13:32:54 INFO - 0x000000000040678F 13:32:54 INFO - 0x00000000004065BF 13:32:54 INFO - kernel32!RegisterWaitForInputIdle+0x0000000000000049 13:32:54 INFO - JavaScript error: chrome://browser/content/tabbrowser.xml, line 2667: NS_ERROR_FAILURE: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIWebProgress.removeProgressListener] 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv) failed with result 0x80520012: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.cpp, line 215 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv) failed with result 0x80520012: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.cpp, line 487 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, false) failed with result 0x8000FFFF: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3011 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(pusher.Push(aBoundElement)) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp, line 308 13:32:54 INFO - WARNING: NS_ENSURE_TRUE(lastNodeWithCaret) failed: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-in-w32-d-0000000000000000000/build/accessible/src/base/nsCaretAccessible.cpp, line 281 13:32:54 INFO - 2985 INFO TEST-END | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | finished in 2481ms 13:32:54 INFO - ++DOMWINDOW == 46 (0AA710D0) [serial = 203] [outer = 0C7CEC20] 13:32:54 INFO - 2986 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | chrome://mochitests/content/a11y/accessible/events/test_focus_browserui.xul | Assertion count 1 is greater than expected range 0-0 assertions.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Severity: major → normal
Priority: P1 → --
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
A11YLOG was docload,doccreate I was getting crashes with doclifecycle when a doc was shutting down, but I'm too tired to debug that tonight.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
So, when the assert fires the top frame on the js stack is closeBrowserWindow() and DocManager::GetDocAccessible() is being called by FocusManager::NotifyOfDOMBlur() both aDocument and aDocument->GetParentDocument() have pres shells, so I think what's happening is that page hide has fired and we've shut the documents down, and now we want to get the document the blur is related to to notify it of the blur, and since its destroyed we try and create a new document for that dom doc.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
seems correct (just in case, related stack): ###!!! ASSERTION: Can't create an accessible for the document!: 'parentDocAcc', file /src/moz1/accessible/src/base/DocManager.cpp, line 373 mozilla::a11y::DocManager::CreateDocOrRootAccessible(nsIDocument*) (/src/moz1/accessible/src/base/DocManager.cpp:374) mozilla::a11y::DocManager::GetDocAccessible(nsIDocument*) (/src/moz1/accessible/src/base/DocManager.cpp:57) mozilla::a11y::FocusManager::NotifyOfDOMBlur(nsISupports*) (/src/moz1/accessible/src/base/FocusManager.cpp:158) nsFocusManager::SendFocusOrBlurEvent(unsigned int, nsIPresShell*, nsIDocument*, nsISupports*, unsigned int, bool, bool) (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsFocusManager.cpp:1920) nsFocusManager::WindowHidden(nsIDOMWindow*) (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsFocusManager.cpp:940) nsGlobalWindow::PageHidden() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:8266) nsGlobalWindow::PageHidden() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:8256) nsDocumentViewer::PageHide(bool) (/src/moz1/layout/base/nsDocumentViewer.cpp:1268) nsDocShell::FirePageHideNotification(bool) (/src/moz1/docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp:1626) nsDocShell::Destroy() (/src/moz1/docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp:4927) nsXULWindow::Destroy() (/src/moz1/xpfe/appshell/src/nsXULWindow.cpp:481) nsWebShellWindow::Destroy() (/src/moz1/xpfe/appshell/src/nsWebShellWindow.cpp:754) nsChromeTreeOwner::Destroy() (/src/moz1/xpfe/appshell/src/nsChromeTreeOwner.cpp:349) nsGlobalWindow::ReallyCloseWindow() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:6958) nsGlobalWindow::FinalClose() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:6905) nsGlobalWindow::Close() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:6849) nsGlobalWindow::Close() (/src/moz1/dom/base/nsGlobalWindow.cpp:6783) NS_InvokeByIndex_P (/src/moz1/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_x86_64_unix.cpp:164)
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
I think it's ok to use cached document here since we use blur to fire focus on the document only.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > I think it's ok to use cached document here since we use blur to fire focus > on the document only. so, my other question here is this perhaps a reason we shouldn't shut down doc accessible on page hide, and only on pres shell destruction?
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #5) > (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > > I think it's ok to use cached document here since we use blur to fire focus > > on the document only. > > so, my other question here is this perhaps a reason we shouldn't shut down > doc accessible on page hide, and only on pres shell destruction? per irc: I wouldn't get of rid pagehide over presshell descruction but I'd changed GetOrCreateAccessible to ignore documents that received page hide events. So the question is does nsIDocument have a flag we could check?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #722628 -
Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 722628 [details] [diff] [review] bug 847636 - a11y focus manager doesn't need to force doc accessible creation on dom blur events Review of attachment 722628 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: accessible/src/base/FocusManager.cpp @@ +155,5 @@ > if (targetNode && targetNode->OwnerDoc() == FocusedDOMDocument()) { > + DocAccessible* doc = GetExistingDocAccessible(targetNode->OwnerDoc()); > + if (doc) { > + doc->HandleNotification<FocusManager, nsINode> > + (this, &FocusManager::ProcessDOMFocus, targetNode->OwnerDoc()); can we do an approach from comment #6?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
> can we do an approach from comment #6?
I think we might be able to find out if we grovel through docshell enougl, but I don't remember exactly. In any case I think it doesn't make much sense to consider creating a doc accessible here, so I'd prefer it used GetCachedDocAccessible()
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #9) > > can we do an approach from comment #6? > > I think we might be able to find out if we grovel through docshell enougl, > but I don't remember exactly. that would be universal fix though > In any case I think it doesn't make much > sense to consider creating a doc accessible here, so I'd prefer it used > GetCachedDocAccessible() the minus of this approach it's not evident why we use a cached document in this case. In general I wouldn't want to have GetDoc() and GetCachedDoc() both since it's not clear which version should I use in this or that case.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #10) > (In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #9) > > > can we do an approach from comment #6? > > > > I think we might be able to find out if we grovel through docshell enougl, > > but I don't remember exactly. > > that would be universal fix though > > > In any case I think it doesn't make much > > sense to consider creating a doc accessible here, so I'd prefer it used > > GetCachedDocAccessible() > > the minus of this approach it's not evident why we use a cached document in > this case. In general I wouldn't want to have GetDoc() and GetCachedDoc() > both since it's not clear which version should I use in this or that case. I think the answer to that is that you should use the function that doesn't force doc creation unless you have a particular need for it. So that way doc accessible is always created by DocManager, and GetDocAccessible() can go away and cache only version can be renamed to just GetDocAccessible()
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
what about the case when a11y is enabled after Firefox?
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #12) > what about the case when a11y is enabled after Firefox? well, we could force create all documents then, but may be current way is best :/ (In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #10) > (In reply to Trevor Saunders (:tbsaunde) from comment #9) > > > can we do an approach from comment #6? > > > > I think we might be able to find out if we grovel through docshell enougl, > > but I don't remember exactly. > > that would be universal fix though So, I talked with smaug a bit about this, and it seems the existing code should work because the child doc shouldn't be visible so CreateDocOrRootAccessible() should return before the assert.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 722628 [details] [diff] [review] bug 847636 - a11y focus manager doesn't need to force doc accessible creation on dom blur events this should be fixed by bug 850797
Attachment #722628 -
Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → tbsaunde+mozbugs
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•