Closed
Bug 849835
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[xh] [Fx] New localization: Xhosa
Categories
(Mozilla Localizations :: xh / Xhosa, defect)
Mozilla Localizations
xh / Xhosa
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: arky, Assigned: dwayne)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 7 obsolete files)
267 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
140.47 KB,
application/x-bzip
|
Pike
:
review+
|
Details |
Xhosa localization effort is reanimated in Pootle http://mozilla.locamotion.org/xh/
Ian Henderson <an(dot)henderson(at)rubric.com> is helping us revive this L10N effort.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Depends on: fx3-l10n-xh
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Dwayne, Can you please upload a tarball for review.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
These are updated for Firefox 21. The strings have been reviewed, updated and translated.
This is not complete yet, since the team's tooling process somehow missed fuzzy entries from Pootle. So all the untranslated strings are in fact fuzzy string in Pootle.
They are busy translating those now, though I thought that they would be finished on Friday (today being Monday).
So for the review, I'm happy if you reject this and want to wait for the completed work. But since this is a reanimation and 67% of translation is complete I think it might be worth basing a review on the work that this team has done.
Attachment #723479 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Updated•12 years ago
|
No longer depends on: fx3-l10n-xh
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
This is Xhosa at 68% translated: security, developer, never and notnb are not touched.
Attachment #723479 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #723479 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #725646 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Axel Can you please review new attachment when you got a moment. :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Latest translations for Xhosa. They've pretty much translated everything. Web parts is also done.
Attachment #725646 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #725646 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #748793 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
100% translated for all the important stuff.
This is the 3rd shot from these guys who have been delivering on time or early for each release. I'm building langpacks but at the moment without any noise from reviewers I'm not sure what is blocking this from moving into Aurora.
Attachment #748793 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #748793 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #757469 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 757469 [details]
Xhosa Firefox 23a2 v1
Looking at http://mozilla.locamotion.org/xh/, there's not much recent activity.
How should we proceed with this request?
noting an r- because the coverage isn't great today eiter.
Attachment #757469 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #8)
> Comment on attachment 757469 [details]
> Xhosa Firefox 23a2 v1
>
> Looking at http://mozilla.locamotion.org/xh/, there's not much recent
> activity.
They translate offline unfortuantely, but yes no activity in 24. Though they have been active in 21, 22 and 23.
>
> How should we proceed with this request?
>
> noting an r- because the coverage isn't great today eiter.
Honestly, land it. They're not likely to continue contributing if we never actually release anything of theirs. They've hit the nail 3 times in a row and been very consistent, now we're excluding them because they didn't make the 4th yet we're only halfway into the fourth.
In terms of coverage, specifically for this language, the only stuff missing is what has been added in 24. Plus the usual downgraded: security, developer and other minor misc.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Updated for Firfox 24.0a2
Attachment #777783 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Minor update before close of 24a2
Attachment #757469 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #777783 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #777783 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #784930 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
All the critical bits translated.
Attachment #784930 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #784930 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #796634 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
As far as I can see xh is more translated the zu, which is an official language. I would appreciate knowing what we can do at our end to get xh into the official channel.
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
per meeting w/arky at summit: the xh locale is active again, and already has repo in aurora, so should get aurora builds again. Explicitly, mozilla-beta and mozilla-release are not to get "xh" builds.
armenzg: you've done most of the recent reviews to this file, can you r?
Attachment #815632 -
Flags: review?(armenzg)
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
arky, axel, beatty:
I think this covers it for RelEng side. Anything else that needs to be done on l10n side before these "xh" builds are (re)enabled?
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Flags: needinfo?(jbeatty)
Flags: needinfo?(hitmanarky)
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 815632 [details] [diff] [review]
enable "xh" on mozilla-aurora
Removing the request until the code lands. Please re-request at that moment.
The code is waiting for Axel to review the attachment.
Attachment #815632 -
Flags: review?(armenzg)
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
We'll answer when we answer.
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Flags: needinfo?(jbeatty)
Flags: needinfo?(hitmanarky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Updated again.
Attachment #796634 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #796634 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #819032 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 819032 [details]
Xhosa 26.0a2 2013-10-18 ff72e65
Sorry for the lag, r=me based on the conversations that Jeff had with Ian. I've also done a technical check, that's mostly good.
The only caveat I have is the localization of the accept-lang defaults in intl.properties.
I'll now go ahead and file a bunch of bugs to guide this to a finalized product ready for download on mozilla.org.
Attachment #819032 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Blocks: fx-l10n-xh
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•